CFI Responds to Recent Incidents of Barbaric Violence

The Center for Inquiry released a statement on Monday reacting to several brutal acts of violence, including the murder of 21 Coptic Christians in Libya by ISIS, the gunman who opened fire at a free speech rally in Copenhagen, Denmark and the killing of three Muslims in Chapel Hill, North Carolina:

Yet again, we find ourselves faced with more instances of terroristic violence as a response to free speech and religion. Just weeks after journalists and cartoonists were murdered in Paris for criticism of religion, there are killings in Copenhagen and gruesome executions in Libya.

Both recent acts were motivated by a desire to silence others—merely because they believe and speak in ways disagreeable to their executioners. These murders strike at the heart of what we at the Center for Inquiry stand for, namely freedom of conscience and freedom of expression.

It is a deeply troubling commentary that so much blood is being shed because a tiny minority of extremists has decided that they cannot countenance having their ideas challenged in any form, be it in writing, in sketches, or even in the very existence of people who simply believe differently. To resort to violence and murder is to declare oneself incapable of rising to that challenge. It is a confession of the weakness of one’s position that it must be defended with bullets instead of words.

In noting these horrific events on foreign soil, we are not ignoring the recent tragedy in Chapel Hill. Although the exact motivations for the murder of the three young Muslims remains unclear, it is difficult to believe that anti-Muslim animosity did not play some role. But whatever the motivation of the killer, his actions must be condemned.

The recent spate of murders can be disheartening. It can make one wonder whether humanity is progressing or regressing. At the Center for Inquiry, however, it has redoubled our resolve. We will, as we always have, remain steadfast in our pursuit of the right to free expression and belief for all, whether or not we agree with those beliefs. We will continue to champion the right to satire, blasphemy, and all manner of peaceful criticism of religion and other sacredly held ideas. Similarly, we will continue to champion the right to peaceful expression of religion. We will continue to work toward a world in which atheists, humanists, Jews, Muslims, Christians, and people of whatever belief can live together in peace.

Hear, hear.

"Sorry, but attending a gala honoring someone is something you either voluntarily attend or not. ..."

How to Think Critically About the ..."
"Wow... this is rich... Aussies have more than just Kenny Ham to get entertained by.As ..."

Swanson: God Will Punish Australia for ..."
"True critical and rational thought would acknowledge that false accusations are extremely rare, but that ..."

How to Think Critically About the ..."
"To clarify... I meant groping a grown woman vs. “dating”, i.e. “molesting” a 14 year ..."

How to Think Critically About the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Jackie the social justice WIZZARD!!!

    We don’t know the cause? He went into their home to kill them. He knocked out the man’s teeth while beating him in his home prior to murdering him and his family.

    It’s a hate crime.

  • Synfandel

    It’s a hate crime.

    Jackie, I suspect they were referring to his motive. That is, why did he hate them? Did it have anything to do with his dislike of Islam? That’s what we don’t yet know.

  • samgardner

    Superb response by the CFI. I’m not quite as sure it’s so hard to believe the Chapel Hill nut was just a nut, rather than a nut motivated by anti-Muslim hatred, but it’s prudent to acknowledge the possibility.

  • StevoR

    @ ^ samgardner : Agreed – I’d say at this stage we (at least in the general public) just don’t know. Insufficient evidence. There are numerous possibilities some a lot more likely than others and it does seem to me that the killer being a nut and being guilty of a hate crime against Muslims are not mutually exclusive – i.e. a case of both rather than either /or.

    Also seconding the superb response by the CFI -very well writ.