Appeals Court: Ashcroft, Mueller Can Be Sued to Abuse of Muslim Detainees

We’ve paid a good deal of attention to the plight of detainees at Guantanamo Bay but very little to the many people who were detained domestically after 9/11, mostly immigrants who had overstayed their visas who were rounded up and assumed to be guilty until proven innocent. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that one lawsuit about the conditions of their detention, one that specifically sues former AG John Ashcroft and former FBI Director Robert Mueller, can go forward.

The case, which was filed 13 years ago and has taken a tortured path through the federal courts, was filed by a group of men who were detained immediately after 9/11. One of the first things the federal government did was track down everyone who was on an expired visa and the ones they thought might be Arab or Muslim were thrown in prison under horrifying conditions and kept there indefinitely while the FBI investigated them to see if they had any role in terrorism. Then they deported them. Their treatment during detention was pretty much everything wrong with this country.

The plaintiffs in Turkmen v. Ashcroft and other 9/11 detainees were placed in solitary confinement for months on end and abused, even though they were only charged with civil immigration violations like overstaying a visa or working without authorization. Though the government had no reason beyond their race and religion to consider them dangerous, they were detained as “suspected terrorists” until cleared of any connection to terrorism by the FBI, and then deported. Among other documented abuses, many of the 9/11 detainees had their faces smashed into a wall where guards had pinned a t-shirt with a picture of an American flag and the words, “These colors don’t run.” The men were slammed against the t-shirt upon their entrance to MDC and told, “Welcome to America.” The t-shirt was smeared with blood, yet it stayed up on the wall at MDC for months.

In its detailed 109-page decision, the court roundly rejected the government’s national security justification for racial profiling: “[T]here is no legitimate governmental purpose in holding someone as if he were a terrorist simply because he happens to be, or appears to be, Arab or Muslim.”

“I am very delighted with the court’s ruling,” said Benamar Benatta, one of the plaintiffs in the case. “It has been a long and stressful process that has taken a tremendous toll on my life, however, it is this kind of bold decision that restores my faith in the U.S. judicial system and gives me hope that justice will be served at the end. It is time for those officials at the highest levels of government to stop hiding behind excuses and answer for their arbitrary and discriminatory decisions that affected, and in some cases ruined, innocent people’s lives.”

A district court judge had dismissed the claims against Ashcroft, Mueller, and Ziglar on the grounds that the complaint did not contain sufficient detail linking them to how the detained men were mistreated, but he allowed claims against the prison officials to proceed. In its ruling today, the court simultaneously rejected an attempt to dismiss the claims against the warden and other prison officials who carried out the abuse against the men while they were detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn.

But one thing that happened since the district court ruling was the release two reports from the DOJ’s Inspector General, which detailed exactly how Ashcroft and Mueller could be directly tied to the detention and mistreatment of the plaintiffs. That report showed that Mueller had established a task force in the FBI and directed it himself, being in daily contact with the FBI field offices in New York and New Jersey where the plaintiffs were detained. And Ashcroft personally established the “hold‐until‐cleared” policy that treated them as guilty until the FBI could prove them innocent.

This does not mean that Ashcroft and Mueller will ultimately be found liable in the case, but it does mean the plaintiffs will get their day in court to prove their case, assuming the Supreme Court doesn’t overturn the appeals court. And you can be certain that the Obama administration will appeal the case, proving once again that this president’s record of zealously protecting the executive branch from any and all accountability for its illegal actions in the war on terror is every bit as bad as Bush’s was. Maybe worse.

The 2nd Circuit ruling ends with an unusual “final thoughts” section:

If there is one guiding principle to our nation it is the rule of law. It protects the unpopular view, it restrains fear‐based responses in times of trouble, and it sanctifies individual liberty regardless of wealth, faith, or color. The Constitution defines the limits of the Defendants’ authority; detaining individuals as if they were terrorists, in the most restrictive conditions of confinement available, simply because these individuals were, or appeared to be, Arab or Muslim exceeds those limits. It might well be that national security concerns motivated the Defendants to take action, but that is of little solace to those who felt the brunt of that decision. The suffering endured by those who were imprisoned merely because they were caught up in the hysteria of the days immediately following 9/11 is not without a remedy.

"" I think maybe what you are getting at with your statements about the Koran ..."

Yes, the Bible Does Say to ..."
"A young man I know explained his estrangement from his father by sharing his paternal ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"We’re into the Smart justifications-Maxwell Smart, that is.Would you believe he chased teenage girls because ..."

Pastor: Moore Liked Young Girls Because ..."
"Studying her linguistic patterns, I think Crokin tipped her hand on this one. She said ..."

Crokin: Hillary Clinton Sex Tape Will ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Modusoperandi

    The suffering endured by those who were imprisoned merely because they were caught up in the hysteria of the days immediately following 9/11 is not without a remedy.


  • Kaintukee Bob

    ‘Allegedly’ did, Modus. Really, how can they prove it? Thousands of documents? That’s just paper! Dead trees! Witnesses? We all know how bad memory is. Really, what are the odds that it was the US? I bet it was the terrorists who brutalized these people, until they were saved by a joint team of marines and SEALs.

    Give me 10 minutes and there’s documents to ‘prove’ it, too!

  • sigurd jorsalfar

    Exactly, modus. Plus it’s not fair for these people to keep bringing this stuff up. I’m sure all the good Arabs and Muslims want to forget about this every bit as much as you and I do.

  • Modusoperandi

    sigurd jorsalfar, we only need to forget about it long enough to get another Republican president, so that we can double down. We have to, on account of all those Muslins Obama’s importing. And even if we didn’t have that excuse we’d have another.

    In any event, like tax cuts, treating people who aren’t Us like shit is too good an idea to fail.

  • StevoR

    The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that one lawsuit about the conditions of their detention, one that specifically sues former AG John Ashcroft and former FBI Director Robert Mueller, can go forward.

    Good to hear and hope it results in more openess and a verdict against that sort of abuse of power.

  • Phillip Hallam-Baker

    I am not that bothered about delay. Let these cases be delayed long enough that juries are willing to convict. And not a second longer.

    Going after Bush and the other war criminals during the Obama administration would have been too soon. But now that their credibility is shot, a successful prosecution is very possible.