The New York Times reports that Trump is going to name one of his billionaire buddies to conduct a “broad review” of America’s intelligence agencies. And what experience does Stephen Weinberg have in intelligence questions? None, of course. You expected anything else.
President Trump plans to assign a New York billionaire to lead a broad review of American intelligence agencies, according to administration officials, an effort that members of the intelligence community fear could curtail their independence and reduce the flow of information that contradicts the president’s worldview.
The possible role for Stephen A. Feinberg, a co-founder of Cerberus Capital Management, has met fierce resistance among intelligence officials already on edge because of the criticism the intelligence community has received from Mr. Trump during the campaign and since he became president. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump blamed leaks from the intelligence community for the departure of Michael T. Flynn, his national security adviser, whose resignation he requested.
There has been no announcement of Mr. Feinberg’s job, which would be based in the White House, but he recently told his company’s shareholders that he is in discussions to join the Trump administration. He is a member of Mr. Trump’s economic advisory council.
Mr. Feinberg, who has close ties to Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, declined to comment on his possible position. The White House, which is still working out the details of the intelligence review, also would not comment…
Mr. Bannon and Mr. Kushner, according to current and former intelligence officials and Republican lawmakers, had at one point considered Mr. Feinberg for either director of national intelligence or chief of the Central Intelligence Agency’s clandestine service, a role that is normally reserved for career intelligence officers, not friends of the president. Mr. Feinberg’s only experience with national security matters is his firm’s stakes in a private security company and two gun makers.
Typical Trump. Name someone totally unqualified to do a task for him to make sure he gets the results he wants. But he better be careful here. The intelligence community is already leaking stuff about him and his closest advisers. And I guarantee you there’s a whole lot more that hasn’t been revealed yet. Which is frankly rather disturbing. I mean, I’m kind of enjoying the use of leaks against Trump, but would I like it when it’s done to someone I support? Of course not. This is not a role that I’m comfortable with having our intelligence agencies play, despite its current target.