Wikileaks Cared Only About Affecting 2016 Election

Foreign Policy has a report that Wikileaks refused to publish a huge cache of material that exposed the goings-on at the Kremlin in 2016, at the same time they were releasing emails to damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign that were hacked under orders from Putin.

cyberhacking

WikiLeaks declined to publish a wide-ranging trove of documents — at least 68 gigabytes of data — that came from inside the Russian Interior Ministry, according to partial chat logs reviewed by Foreign Policy.

The logs, which were provided to FP, only included WikiLeaks’s side of the conversation…

“We had several leaks sent to Wikileaks, including the Russian hack. It would have exposed Russian activities and shown WikiLeaks was not controlled by Russian security services,” the source who provided the messages wrote to FP. “Many Wikileaks staff and volunteers or their families suffered at the hands of Russian corruption and cruelty, we were sure Wikileaks would release it. Assange gave excuse after excuse.”…

WikiLeaks in its early years published a broad scope of information, including emails belonging to Sarah Palin and Scientologists, phone records of Peruvian politicians, and inside information from surveillance companies. “We don’t have targets,” Assange said at the time.

But by 2016, WikiLeaks had switched course, focusing almost exclusively on Clinton and her campaign.

Approached later that year by the same source about data from an American security company, WikiLeaks again turned down the leak. “Is there an election angle? We’re not doing anything until after the election unless its [sic] fast or election related,” WikiLeaks wrote. “We don’t have the resources.”

Anything not connected to the election would be “diversionary,” WikiLeaks wrote.

“WikiLeaks schedules publications to maximize readership and reader engagement,” WikiLeaks wrote in a Twitter message to FP. “During distracting media events such as the Olympics or a high profile election, unrelated publications are sometimes delayed until the distraction passes but never are rejected for this reason.”

And yet this cache of information was, in fact, rejected. That last statement is quite telling, I think. Assange was focused solely on disrupting the presidential election, which he did. And the fact that Russia had suddenly become his best friend and he refused to publish negative material on that country speaks very loudly.

"Trump boasts about assaulting women, and then says women who accuse him of it are ..."

Ingraham: Sexual Harassment Complaints are Ruining ..."
"Hell, if congress wanted to go nuclear, they could simply define by law that SCOTUS ..."

Trump is Going to Fire Mueller
"It may be most popular for eschatological reasons, but it is also pretty damn popular ..."

Trump, Jerusalem and Dispensational Premillenialism

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment