In short: RDFRS was accusing Timonen of “embezzling $375,000” from the charity.
His lawyer claims it was just too costly to keep it going:
“We’d been litigating for nine months and estimated that it probably would cost at least another $100,000,” Dawkins’s lawyer, Blaine Greenberg, tells Mandrake. “I recommended not to continue, entirely on a cost-benefit analysis.”
Timonen just says he was in the right all along:
Timonen, a web designer, claims that Dawkins dropped the case because of a lack of evidence.
So no real resolution, but at least that drama is over. Maybe. I think.