Like just about every American child between the ages five and fifteen, my daughter Sally is a huge Minecraft aficionado. As I’ve watched her play, I’ve found myself bothered by gender issues that should be easy to fix but instead seem ubiquitous in our world today. Read more

The author of this article on the No Greater Joy website likely thinks his daughter is lucky to be so protected. He probably doesn’t realize that after reading his article, I’m more worried about whether his daughter is safe from him than anything else. Read more

I often heard, growing up, that dressing modestly wasn’t about rules, it was about the heart attitude. In other words, if you were focused on the right thing—on God—you would naturally dress modestly, without having to run through a list of rules. You wouldn’t even think about wearing short shorts, or showing your midriff, or wearing clothing that accentuates your bust. Read more

It’s time for another Lesbian Duplex thread! If you have a link or article or interesting thought that’s not relevant to an ongoing thread, you can share it here. If a conversation on another post has turned entirely off topic, you can bring it here also. Every so often, as the number of comments on a given Lesbian Duplex post becomes unmanageable, I put up a fresh post. I’ve added a “chatter” tab under my blog banner that will direct readers to… Read more

Remember that we left off as Bill Walinski, Gwen, and Stan entered the court room, leaving little Casey outside the room with her grandmother, June. Farris tells us that the hearing, in which social worker Donna Corliss and prosecutor Gail Willet sought to have Casey taken into foster care for a week for observation and evaluation, was presided over by Judge Philip Romer. Read more

I’ve had a lot of ugh today, so I thought I’d share some. Read more

The framing issues here are fascinating. The CRC argues that children have a right to be raised by their parents, barring extenuating circumstances like abuse or neglect. Farris et al. frame this right as belonging primarily to parents—i.e., that a frivolous removal of a child by child protective services is a violation of the parent’s fundamental right to raise their child. In other words, both the writers of the CRC and Farris believe removing children from their parents without reason is a violation of someone’s rights—but while the CRC sees it as a violation of children’s rights, Farris sees it as a violation of parents’ rights. Read more

I don’t have a problem with people arguing that Christians should be monogamous, or finding ways to interpret the bible to support monogamy. I do, however, have a problem with Christians arguing that something is transparently obviously and unquestioningly biblical when it is anything but. Go ahead and form your own interpretation—but please, oh please, don’t claim the Bible is “clear” on an issue when it’s obviously more complicated than that. Read more

By Samantha. What has stuck with me about this particular conversation is the reaction I got: it had never occurred to these moms to wonder if their kids might be struggling with anxiety– social anxiety or otherwise. These moms are wonderful, loving people. They adore their kids. They’re responsible parents. And yet, “maybe he doesn’t like XYZ because he has anxiety” just wasn’t an option they’d considered. Read more

Dr. Sears, who is widely known as the founder of AP, says he’s never seen a child raised on AP go wrong—that children raised this way are as a rule nicer, more compassionate, and on and on. I’ve seen this sort of promise before—from Michael Pearl. I am not saying that I put their parenting teachings in the same category—I most emphatically do not. It’s just that I don’t think these sorts of promises are ever realistic. Children are wild cards, and while parents certainly have some influence they don’t have the ability to definitively determine how their children turn out. Any time anyone makes this sort of promise, I get red flags. Read more

Follow Us!



Browse Our Archives