How to Write the Most Unlikable Atheist for TV

So I came across this post on the Friendly Atheist. It includes this image.

TV

This is such a fundamental misunderstanding of storytelling. These are interesting, likable characters. Dexter Morgan and Sheldon Cooper are so interesting that they carry the weight of their otherwise poorly executed stories on their shoulders.

Let’s ignore for a fact that being robot or a misanthrope or a pessimist is not even a flaw. Let’s ignore that the positive characteristics of all these characters except Dexter is much more than their flaws. They’re intelligent and witty and independent. Let’s think what should be done to satisfy the person who made this image.

Let’s imagine that you have written an atheist character who is completely flawless. She fits to the society. She’s nice to everyone. It is a human being, with abundance of emotions, is a pacifist, loves humans as much as butterflies, and speaks in inspirational quotes photopshopped over the image of a scenery. Congratulations, you have created a character with no literary worth, whom the viewers will wish to violently die in every episode. You have managed to deconvert Mary Sue. She’s boring, and serves no point.

These characters are likable, interesting, and greatly written in spite of their flaws, but because of them.

Because the engine of a story is conflict. Conflict makes things interesting. Internal conflict is better. Flaws create conflict. No one likes to watch 8 seasons of a perfectly adjusted doctor who treats patient for the same reason you don’t go to a great hospital for entertainment.

Plus, such conflicts open a window to our own flaws, to how humans work. They provide insight. They are what makes literature valuable.

And you know the other fundamental misunderstanding is to treat characters as representatives of demographics rather than individuals. There are types, and works that deal with types. But great characters are individuals and should not be generalized into statements about atheists as a whole.

Literature and arts are not propaganda. They aren’t meant to advertise atheists or any other groups. They should be interesting and insightful, and they should be challenging and take you out of your comfort zone.

The last time we had a literary movement dedicated to praising an atheist and portraying him as flawless that atheist was Joseph Stalin and the movement was Socialist Realism. Nobody studies that movement for literary reasons now.

"I agree with you 100 percent. TJ is not a racist or a misogynist!"

Atheists Should Not Ignore the Bigotry ..."
"Thanks Kaveh. Gleb's habit of avoiding honest criticism and vilifying his accusers has to end ..."

Honoring the Truth Begins at Home
"Now do a Hillary Clinton one....an alternate future after Hillary seriously campaigned in Michigan, Wisconsin ..."

Looking Back at President Bernie Sanders, ..."
"Bernie wasn't opposed to NAFTA during his campaign, because the field jobs done by Mexican ..."

Looking Back at President Bernie Sanders, ..."
Follow Us!
POPULAR AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment