In the name of “Right to Life” Quiverfull moms could lose their lives
In June of 2008, Vision Forum posed the following question from their Witherspoon School of Law and Public Policy on its website: “If abortion is the murder of a human being, is it biblical to oppose all abortions?” The organization addressed this topic in a series of blog posts on the matter, determining definitively that tubal ectopic pregnancy did not justify surgery to remove the fatally compromised fetus along with a pregnant woman’s fallopian tube.
Despite the medical fact that tubal pregnancies prove to be fatal to the fetus in all cases, the Vision Forum group determined that any surgery which ends any ectopic pregnancy to rescue the mother constitutes an elective abortion, unequivocally qualifying as a utilitarian decision which amounts to the murder of the already terminal fetus. The group also improperly downplayed the incidence, morbidity, and mortality associated with tubal pregnancy.
Though the Catholic Pro-Life position supports surgical intervention in the case of tubal pregnancy to save the mother, Vision Forum’s dangerous position continues to spread throughout sectors within the Evangelical Christian community.
All images by Cindy Kunsman and Under Much Grace used with permission.
Editor’s note: Cindy has put a ton of work into compiling just about anything you could ever want to know about TLC’s the Duggar family. Posting this at NLQ so we can have a reference to all that is Duggar and Quiverfull. Thanks for doing this Cindy!
As part of a presentation, I decided to create what is essentially an online bibliography for those interested in background information about the Duggars, the Independent Fundamental Baptists (IFB), Gothard, Quiverfull, and the Troubled Teen Homes within the IFB. Information about them all can be accessed (more…)
Dr. Patrick Johnston is an Ohio family practice physician, founder of the Association of Pro-life Physicians, and the director of Personhood Ohio. He and his wife have nine children, all of whom are homeschooled. Several years ago, Johnston wrote a rebuttal to a post that I published about my views on abortion and personhood laws. Johnston believes there are no justifiable reasons for women to have abortions. Rape? Nope. Incest? Nope. Life of the mother? Nope or maybe. Severe physical malformation? Nope. Ectopic(tubal) pregnancy? Nope Huh? That’s right, Johnston does not think women should have access to abortion services if they have an ectopic pregnancy. In a December 2015 Personhood Ohio article, Johnston stated: (more…)
I’m going to walk away from Tom B’s response to me for a bit and just sit down by this fire and have a chat with a little boy. Tom, you’re a little boy. You may be 20, but you have no idea how to live in the real world. Your rigid ideas of life may make you a disciplined young man, but it won’t go far in your relationships with the rest of humanity. (more…)
Editor’s note: As a woman who has seriously struggled with infertility while quiverfull, just like many of you here have, I find Zsuzsanna’s words mocking another infertile mother upsetting and vile. Where’s the love of Christ in any of this? One lesson learned through the years is that things you throw rocks at because it’s a battle you do not have can become the same problem for you. Universal reciprocity or karma just seems to like to work that way.(more…)
Sixteen years ago, a baby was born in Bulgaria. At four months old, he was placed in an orphanage. The orphanage young Tommy was placed at was hell on Earth. The director “modified” the foods fed to the children to prevent them from growing normally. By doing this, the director kept the children permanently in the youngest/weakest group of the orphanage where the orphanage received the most funds for the children. Tommy was listed at age 15 as “Male child at 15 years of age, with the following diagnoses: Infantile Cerebral Palsy – Hypotonic form; Severe lagging behind in the physical and neuro-psychical development; Severe protein-caloric malnutrition – unspecified; Ectopic [undescended] testicle – condition after surgery for correction.” Tommy was slowly dying – and time was running out. If he was not adopted by the time he turned sixteen in the spring of 2013, he would be considered an adult in his home country, moved to an adult institution, and be ineligible for adoption domestically or internationally.
With proper nutrition and intensive therapy, Katie has thrived and is much healthier, although her body and intellectual development have been permanently damaged from the years of neglect.
Now, to adopt Katie, the Musser family went through the steps required of any adoptive family. A home study was conducted. Family finances were studied. Background checks and medical examinations of the parents were completed. To adopt a child, a family must make at least 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. Since their family was so large, you add $5,075 for each additional person to reach the family size including the adopted child. In a domestic adoption, families need to produce three years worth of financial evidence showing income at or above the 125% guideline. For reasons that are never explained, the agency that the Musser family used either only used income verification for one year which was a higher than average year.
While the Mussers’ home-schooled most of their family, they sensibly recognized that Katie needed more than they alone could provide and sent her to a good program in the local school system and acted as healthy advocates for her.
Meanwhile, Susanna found out about Tommy before June 15, 2012. Orignally, they hoped to adopt Tommy, but would not make the financial requirements that year. In her words, ” Our income last year was significantly lower than the stated income requirement for a family of our size. Not even within sight of that golden number”. Since Tommy’s situation was critical, Susanna used her blog to publicize Tommy’s plight since he was going to age out of adoption in less than one year.
In the meantime, she worked with the agency and the government to see if there was any way the Musser family could adopt Tommy.
The government agency suggested applying the value of their home, cars, savings and investments to boost their “income” to the required levels.
They asked their church leaders and friends for input on if the family was taking on too much by adopting Tommy. Their community gave their blessing.
The agency with whom they were working for this adoption did not require the same level of pre-screening as the previous agency (“(no psychologist visit, letter of employment, or local police clearance, for instance), and our home study doesn’t have to be written from scratch for Tommy”) (The agency that handled Tommy’s adoption is About a Child)
She also adapted her family’s way of life.
She hired “mother’s helpers” to assist her in housework and became comfortable with home visits from therapists.
On June 29,2012, Susanna was able to announce that they would be able to adopt Tommy.
The family reached out to a social worker who came from a large family with multiple special needs adopted children who completed their home study. The family had needed to do two home studies to adopt Katie since one agency refused to approve them due to family size.
Their medical and mental competence was assured by their family doctor.
While in the process of adopting Tommy, Susanna found out she was pregnant again. She asked the agency if that would be a problem and was assured that it would not interrupt the adoption.
Susanna traveled overseas to fulfill the requirements of Tommy’s home country while very pregnant and with a severely sprained ankle.
She and a physical therapist friend assess Tommy’s actual level of development and teach the staff safer ways to lift children with fragile bones, how to use a gait trainer and bring lots of badly needed supplies.
A family picture was taken in March 2013 with a caption of the ages of their children so far:
This picture was taken at the end of March, 2013. Back, left to right-Joseph, 19, holding Katie, 11, Joshua, 16, Joe, holding Stephen, 4 1/2, Susanna, holding Verity, 2 1/2, Daniel, 17 1/2, and Laura, 13 1/2 Middle-Jane, 11 Front, left to right-John Michael, 7 1/2, James, 6, and Peter, 6
Tommy’s adoption went through on April 9th, 2013 becoming their twelfth child and their third child with developmental delays.
Their 13th son, Benjamin was born on or around April 29th, 2013.
Tommy arrived home on June 17, 2013.
To visualize the ages of the children more easily at the time Benjamin was born (chronologically)
Tommy (16 – developmentally delayed to toddlerhood; has a seizure disorder)
Katie (11 – developmentally delayed to around age 2)
John Michael (7.5),
Verity (2.5 – minor developmental delays)
Or to quote Susanna “We have four booster seats and four car seats in our big van. That’s eight little people who are developmentally age seven and under.”
A year later, Susanna was left alone with eight little ones who were at the developmental age of eight or below. Somehow, Tommy was left unattended for a period of time while he was in the bathtub. Tommy drowned. With Tommy’s developmental age and seizure disorder, he was at high risk for drowning in a very short period time in a small amount of water.
In my next post, I’ll look at the level of stress and exhaustion Susanna Musser was under prior to Tommy’s accidental death.
Vision Forum Ministries (the not-for-profit arm of Vision Forum) capitalizes upon connotation and summarizes their family and Pro-Life oriented Mission Statement by describing themselves as Christians who follow patriarchy as well as their created concept of “multigenerational faithfulness.”
Trusting people often fail to recognize the darker doctrines beneath the pleasant pictures connoted including “Protestant Exclusivism,” their own version of Darwinian social engineering, and their view which defines daughters as a “dynamic means” for a man to “extend his influence into other covenantal family units.” The group’s claims of an uncompromising Pro-Life status also beguile and mislead trusting followers while they concurrently recommend alternatives like stoning rebellious teens as well as the refusal of surgery for women carrying a life-threatening tubal pregnancy.
Following the previous post about Vision Forum’s plans to advance their thesis regarding surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy before confirmed death of an unborn baby as the ethical equivalent of elective abortion, several insightful questions have been presented in different areas around the blogosphere including the NLQ Forum. They are worth noting.
The discussion raised some interesting questions about the actual risk (morbidity and mortality) related to ectopic pregnancy as weighed against the chance of a non-tubal ectopic pregnancy producing a live birth. Refer to this HERE at Under Much Grace which includes some great diagrams and statistics from sources including the CDC and Lancet.
Most notably, ectopic pregnancy accounts for 6-9% of all maternal deaths in the US. Assuming that these statistics also apply to other developed countries and those countries that do not provide state-of-the-art care to their citizens, this translates to a rough single year death rate of 25,000 worldwide (in 2008 based on Lancet’s estimate) due to ectopic pregnancy.
And the odds of a baby from non-tubal ectopic pregnancy surviving the pregnancy? One in 60 million. That means that worldwide (assuming a general birthrate of 134 million annually for the past 30 years), only one such birth occurs every 6.7 years, based on a now current and somewhat stable global birth rate.
Vision Forum will laud one baby every 7 years while 25,000 mothers die in one year? Hmmm.
This information out of Lancet and from the CDC paints quite a different picture than Samaritan Ministry’s publications when they reproduced Vision Forum’s new dogma.(I think Vyckie’s karma ran over their dogma!)