Denmark bans religious slaughter: ‘Animal rights come before religion’

In a small step towards a more humane society, Denmark has passed a new law forbidding the slaughter of live or non-anesthetized animals.

Muslims and Jews are angry because the ban is contrary to their religious practices. However, Denmark’s Agriculture and Food Minister Dan Jørgensen defended the government’s decision by declaring “animal rights come before religion.”

In order to be considered kosher under Jewish law or halal under Islamic law, animals must be conscious when killed. Scientists and animal rights activists consider this kind of ritual religious slaughter to be cruel and inhumane:

Research carried out by an international group of experts on the ritual in slaughterhouses confirmed that the slaughter carried out through slits to the throat and bleeding with no loss of consciousness is extremely inhumane and causes unimaginable suffering to the animal.

The new law in Denmark, which follows similar regulations in other European countries, requires animals be stunned before slaughter. It is a simple and humane requirement that minimizes the suffering of the animal. Yet apparently some Muslims and Jews will not be satisfied unless the animal suffers a slow and agonizing death in order to appease some god that does not exist.

"I cannot for the life of me understand how these people can believe in gawd ..."

Florida Responds To Shooting By Forcing ..."
"Sure! The awesome power of the SIGN!....I can just imagine a demented ammo-sexual approaching the ..."

Florida Responds To Shooting By Forcing ..."
"Oh, yeah, that's JUST what we need - making the problem even worse. Libertarians and ..."

Florida Responds To Shooting By Forcing ..."
"Once again, we're going to have to agree to disagree. To me, the evidence in ..."

Congressman: ‘You Can’t Separate Church From ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • pianoman

    this is a good start. i hope denmark stands firm on this.

  • Mike

    Where is the link to the actual research? Your “research” link only links to another article stating that research was done, and not citing any studies or providing links itself.

    • Kevin Poole

      Hey wise ass!! Come here, let me slit your throat and see how you feel!!!