How Various Studies Disprove Noah’s Flood

I’m having some fun with a new video series. I wish it wasn’t necessary to do this series anymore, but in the last year with the opening of Ken Ham’s Ark park and the appointment of a presidential cabinet made up entirely of science denialists means that yes, I still have to explain how we know that Noah’s ark was only ever a goddamn fable and that grown-ups seriously should not still believe such nonsense in the age of information.

So far this new video series looks like it will consists of the following episodes:
How Meteorology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Geology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Paleontology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Dendrochronology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Zoology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Anthropology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Archaeology Disproves Noah’s Flood
How Mythology Disproves Noah’s Flood

Just as the episode on Meteorology was really more about physics, the one on Dendrochronology will be more about plant life in general rather than being only about tree rings. That’s the episode I’m working on next, and I want to be sure to include everything that will most directly refute the idea of an earth of younger than 10,000 years as well as a global flood happening at any point within the last 6,000 years or so. So if you know of any fact that should be included in that script, or in any of the subsequent scripts, please leave a comment to let me know to research and include it.

"The technique is called "misdirection".Mike is a stage magician for the dimwitted and the dishonest."

Not gonna rocket, just gonna stroke ..."
"I'm pretty tired of atheists thinking they are gaining some kind of debating point by ..."

Open letter to Clovis Star
"The cultist lied about me deleting my own comments. That's all I needed to know ..."

Open letter to Clovis Star
"This is both amusing and depressing. I feel sorry for the Creationist. Imagine living that ..."

Open letter to Clovis Star

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment