Demand the US Military institute a Sex Offender registry – NOW!

Nicole McCoy is doing a fantastic job of exposing the invisible war that many of this nation’s military members are fighting. When Nicole was in the Marine Corps, she was raped and sexually assaulted multiple times. Nicole reported it and was met with humiliation and intimidation.

Nicole McCoy’s story

I joined the military because I wanted to serve my country.  I served as a Lance Corporal in the Marines for over three years.  In that time I was raped twice and sexually assaulted another two times.

The first time it happened I was serving abroad in Afghanistan.  After that first incident I was assaulted three other times over the course of three years.  It came to happen so often that I assumed it was normal and that it must happen to everyone.  I never received any training on how to deal with sexual assault in the military- I didn’t even know how to report it.

When I finally decided to report the sexual assaults I was led through a maze of questions and excuses and I was even discouraged from reporting the crimes.  In the end, instead of getting justice I was ostracized and humiliated.

I learned that there is currently no national military sex offender registry and that offenders are not required to disclose their crimes on their discharge papers.  A sex offender registration for convicted for military personal would help to address the impunity that surrounds rape within rape the military.  Most veterans are honorable men and women who have served our country, but there are some who have committed serious crimes like rape and sexual assault during their service and the military has a responsibility to disclose that information for the sake of the public good.

When asked why sex offenders do not have to disclose on their discharge papers, some of the responses I was given were 1) It will take too long to create a national database or 2) the military is going green and it takes too much paper to add an extra check box to discharge papers.

This is part of a larger issue of rape within the military.  Some estimates reveal that more than 1/3 of women in the armed services are raped during their service.  If you serve in the US military and you rape or sexually assault a fellow service member you have an 86.5% chance of keeping the crime a secret and a 92% chance of avoiding court martial.

Join me in asking the Department of Defense to create a national database for sex offenders.

CLICK HERE TO

SIGN THE PETITION

19,000 Rapes and Sexual Assaults per year

The DoD itself estimates that military members face over 19,000 rapes and sexual assaults annually. Although this pace has been sustained for at least the last two years, it represents a huge increase historically. Unfortunately, the DoD spent more money on that useless and unconstitutional mandatory Spiritual Fitness test than they do on rape response and prevention (military-wide).

There are some things you can do to help Nicole and the tens of thousands of rape and sexual assault victims in the military. First off, anybody can sign this petition – even those living outside of USA.

If you’re a victim, please send Nicole your story (you can request anonymity). She’s collecting stories for an upcoming project to further her cause – drastically increasing awareness and implementing enforceable and realistic controls for sexual assault.

She’s demanding that the DoD implement a Sex Offender registry for the military. Furthermore she’s asking that sex offenders who do kicked out for their crimes also get added to extant civilian sex offender registries. This is crucial, as I’ve personally seen one of my soldiers get kicked out for statutory rape with a 14 year old girl. His punishment: get out of the military. That’s it. Nothing else.

Another way you can help is by spreading the word. Watch her video, educate yourself, and then spread the word.

www.youtube.com/embed/XHGUoHCGaWo?

Sadly, there really is a small but vocal segment of the US population that outright blame women for their rapes because they joined the military.

Being ‘raped too much’…

I believe this is what people call a ‘gender traitor’… perhaps just ‘traitor’ would be just as accurate. Liz Trotta at Fox News made me yell at the television when I saw this.

www.youtube.com/embed/4ooMMue-qwQ?

Yeah. Disgusting.

Reap has an article from last year that noticed the trend.

Representative Jackie Speier,  who also told the  House of Representatives in Feb the story about her abortion while they decided whether to de-fund planned parenthood, made a statement about rapes in the military. In her speech the following points were made-

  • Women in the U.S. military are more likely to be raped by fellow soldiers than killed by enemy fire.
  • One victim was lectured by the base chaplain, who claimed that 96 percent of sexual assaults on women occur when drinking is involved. The victim had not been drinking.
  • In another case after seeking the assistance of the military chaplain, he told her “it must have been God’s will for her to be raped” and recommended she attend church more frequently.
  • The Department of Defense estimates that more than 19,000 service members were raped or sexually assaulted in 2010.
  • Only 13.5 percent of the victims report when they have been raped.

Please sign the petition and share this with everyone you know.

Print Friendly
About Justin Griffith
  • julian

    I’ve passed this on to every Marine I know. Same response from each: “That doesn’t already happen?”

  • oolon

    No idea who Liz Trotta is but the bloke reading the news even seemed shocked that she was blaming the ‘radical feminists’ and maybe even the women in the army for sexual assault? I can’t quite believe it myself – does she think its a natural consequence of men and women being in close proximity and men have no responsibility? I wasn’t going to watch the video as Nicole’s story is bad enough but how do people like that get on TV news in the US? I think someone’s career would be right royally screwed if they said something so insane on UK TV.

  • http://www.improbablejoe.blogspot.com Improbable Joe

    Back in my day, we knew what was what in the Marines… women Marines would get sexually harassed/assaulted and they would be blamed for it, called whores and sluts, then probably sexually harassed/assaulted some more on account of she was clearly asking for it. After a constant stream of that plus shit duty and trumped up charges on flimsy reasoning, she’d be forced out. After all, that was sort of thing that could happen to people who complained too much about anything, and when you add in the general misogyny that seemed to fill each and every day…

  • greg

    Of course due punishment should always be meted out, but my innate sense of fairness detects a minor problem with registries of this type, or disclosure on release papers. The problem is that they are deliberately trying to leverage unregulated punishment by the rest of society – but it’s unregulated. This leads to the problem of people who are convicted of “raping” their 16 yo gf when they are 17 and everything was completely consentual etc. getting their lives ruined not just through the punishment in the court system, but the ensuing unregulated pile-on that happens in wider society.

    The pile on is particularly badly unregulated because everyone assumes the individual has not been punished enough yet, so basically they punish them extra… and secondly, based on what is ultimately an extremely unreliable system. We see what percent of cases are reported and not handled appropriately by this system as it stands. The thing is they will *still* be handled inappropriately/incompetently after any reforms to decrease the false negative rate is made.

    So first, punishment should always be regulated and unfortunately due to the gross irrationality surrounding anything even tangentially sex related in this society combined with the unreliability of the labeling system, that means labeling individuals indelibly in a registry or on their release papers is probably not good justice.

    They should instead simply be adequately punished with jail time and financial punishments in-house, as well as prevented from committing any further crimes and protecting potential future victims by being removed from the opportunity to etc. in a controlled manner.

  • BethE

    And then there’s that Airforce base in Texas…

    http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/07/12/515776/gop-rep-on-sexual-assault-at-usaf-base-theres-no-evidence-of-a-widespread-problem/

    But don’t worry, someone from the GOP doesn’t think there’s evidence of a widespread problem!

  • julian

    For fuck’s sake.

    as well as prevented from committing any further crimes and protecting potential future victims by being removed from the opportunity to etc. in a controlled manner.

    How?

  • Robert B.

    I thought of that, greg, and I don’t support sex offender registries in general. But the problem of rape in the military is so big that I hesitate to oppose anything that works against it. Bad justice would have to be really freakin’ bad to be worse than what our soldiers/sailors/marines/airmen/coasties are enduring now. Frankly, in the case of military rape, it’s much more likely that everyone’s assumptions are right and the rapist hasn’t been punished enough. (Assuming that punishment is an effective way to deal with criminals, which I’m not sure of but have no alternate models to propose.)

    I’d prefer to see a situation where rapists are routinely tried, convicted, and punished in proportion to civilian punishments for the same crime. Or better yet, I’d rather that more rapes be prevented in the first place, though I’m the wrong sort of nerd to know how that might be done. But I’ll take whatever improvements I can get. (Not that “I” am actually getting anything, since I’ve never served in the military.)

  • http://itsmyworldcanthasnotyours.blogspot.com WMDKitty (Always growing and learning)

    Signed. Any number of rapes is too many rapes.

  • Paul Loebe

    Thanks for addressing this again Justin. This is a very important issue and very dear to me.

  • abb3w

    It might be more effective if the petition was being run using the White House petition system. Admittedly, the White House petitions usually seem to only get token notice; however, that’s better than change.org petitions manage.

    And that “Commander in Chief” hat has to be good for something….

    • Justin Griffith

      I actually disagree. I’ve had massive success with Change.org

      EVERY signature generates a new email to whoever it’s set up to hit. I’ve accidentally forced generals and state-level politicians to change email accounts before.

      • abb3w

        I stand corrected, then.

        I would thus revise the suggestion to an additional petition on that system.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X

%d bloggers like this: