High weirdness

Like many creationism-watchers, I regularly visit sites such as The Discovery Institute, Answers in Genesis, and so on. I like weirdness, and these are good places to find views that are very weird from a mainstream scientific standpoint.

Today I ran into a paper in the Answers Research Journal that is high weirdness indeed: “An Apology and Unification Theory for the Reconciliation of Physical Matter and Metaphysical Cognizance” by Desmond P. Allen. Hoo boy. I don’t know how to describe it—best read it, or read it as far as you can stand. It’s one of the more interesting combinations of quantum-inspired craziness and young-earth creationism that I’ve ever run into. Normally, the two don’t mix well. I almost always see quantum abuse in more New Agey circles. And creationism, well, it’s popular, but it has a very narrow constituency nonetheless.

On top of that, there’s the “metaphysics” aspect of the whole thing. So here’s a combination of three separate forms of drivel: metaphysical pontification and two usually quite distinct forms of pseudoscience.

Quite an accomplishment.

"Is that a useful distinction? Certainly the cause of the universe was something exotic and ..."

Taking Atheism Ignorantly
"FWIW, Aquinas himself does not reject the position of Avicenna and Al Gazali that there ..."

Taking Atheism Ignorantly
"Thanks. I'm a little unclear about the meaning of your second sentence though. No one ..."

Taking Atheism Ignorantly
"Some theists do say God is a brute fact. Plantinga for instance."

Taking Atheism Ignorantly

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment