Conservapedia on “atheism”

Here’s a fun way to waste half an hour: look over the Conservapedia entry on atheism.

It starts off with a picture of “The perverse and cruel atheist Marquis de Sade in prison,” which is a pretty good indication of the sort of material that is to come. In some ways, it’s a nice one-stop shopping center for calumnies against nonbelief favored by American conservatives. I will admit, it has links to some useful sociological information concerning religious versus nonreligious populations, though it is one-sided and very US-centered. But that’s a minor part of the entry. Naturally, the bulk consists of misconceptions and misrepresentations.

The very existence of Conservapedia is a monument to dishonesty. Many American conservatives go purple in the face railing against political correctness, relativism, politically determined standards of truth, bias, etc. etc. Their solution, naturally, is to exhibit extreme versions of these faults. If they take over a public institution, they will gut it, as with the American government. If they can’t take over, such as with American science, they will seek to form parallel institutions to propagate a religiously correct vision of reality. So we had conservatives complaining about “bias” in Wikipedias treatment of certain subjects such as evolution, and therefore they produced a nicely creationist web site, Conservapedia, as an alternative.

"I have bought into the tentative, evidence based, hypothesis forming of Popper's empiricism. I start ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"For the record, I would call myself a dualist who is not committed to any ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"dcleve, thanks for responding. So it seems you are a bonafied Cartesian substance dualist! That's ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Jayman,Thanks for your thoughtful response. First, a bit of a clarification: I am not myself ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment