Richard Carrier’s Notes on the Jesus Project

Richard Carrier recently posted on hig blog his take on a recent conference of the Jesus Project. Based on Carrier’s description, it sounds like a very interesting scholarly project indeed. One particular paragraph in Carrier’s blog made me chuckle:

Some said they were down on the Project because James Tabor was prominently associated with it (he’s supposedly a crank historicist), while others said they were down on the Project because Frank Zindler was invited to give a paper (he’s supposedly a crank mythicist). This is all rather ironic, since being down on the Project for being too sympathetic to historicity and mythicism entails a rather obvious contradiction, and belies instead the fact that the Project isn’t “too sympathetic” to either. Citing evidence that we’re willing to hear out scholars of wildly diverse perspectives only confirms the validity of what we’re doing.

LINK

"From the assumption that everything is determined, we cannot soundly deduce that no improvements can ..."

How Atheists get it Wrong, According ..."
""How could a materialist think that consciousness isn't an "illusion"?"Read 'A Physicalist Manifesto' atheist by ..."

How Atheists get it Wrong, According ..."
"I don't understand your question in relation to the quote you have extracted from my ..."

How Atheists get it Wrong, According ..."
"Thanks, Keith, for the clarification of the view that Hick is proposing, and especially as ..."

How Atheists get it Wrong, According ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment