A question of authority

I like this cartoon, from the creationist organization Answers in Genesis. It expresses a conservative religious concern about the source and authority of morality very well.

If there is no external, transcendent, supernatural, absolute, objective, (insert any other hardening adjectives you like) source of rules, then people are just making the rules up. And if so, what stops someone from adopting self-serving, community-exploiting “rules”?

It’s a good question. Nonbelievers have to spill a lot of ink trying to answer it. I don’t think we do a bad job of it—certainly not compared to the authoritarian nonsense a cartoon like this is actually defending. But the secular, humanistic ways we figure out how to regulate our lives together are also complicated, ambiguous, imperfect. They’re hard to put in a cartoon. Compared to the visceral appeal of God-given rules this cartoon expresses, the secular version has to labor against a intuitive disadvantage.

"I will continue to analyze and evaluate the rest of Kreeft's arguments ; five more ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I'm more so saying this particular forum is not the place to discuss psychological arguments ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Keith:1) Pinker rewtweeted your article: https://twitter.com/sapinke...2) Great to "hear from you" via the article! (https://twitter.com/jwardne..."

Conservative Pundit Ross Douthat Takes on ..."
"Your discussion has been very interestting and it doesn't surprise me that you got so ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment