A question of authority

I like this cartoon, from the creationist organization Answers in Genesis. It expresses a conservative religious concern about the source and authority of morality very well.

If there is no external, transcendent, supernatural, absolute, objective, (insert any other hardening adjectives you like) source of rules, then people are just making the rules up. And if so, what stops someone from adopting self-serving, community-exploiting “rules”?

It’s a good question. Nonbelievers have to spill a lot of ink trying to answer it. I don’t think we do a bad job of it—certainly not compared to the authoritarian nonsense a cartoon like this is actually defending. But the secular, humanistic ways we figure out how to regulate our lives together are also complicated, ambiguous, imperfect. They’re hard to put in a cartoon. Compared to the visceral appeal of God-given rules this cartoon expresses, the secular version has to labor against a intuitive disadvantage.

"I should, of course, have said that for an Aristotelian causation is a relation of ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"General relativity is also incompatible with quantum mechanics. Does that make quantum mechanics unscientific?You can't ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Premise (1) is the basic factual claim upon which the argument rests. This claim seems ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Hello Ron and Michael, are you speaking loosely when you speak of a moments or ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment