Modal logic

In every possible world, modal logic is a useless waste of time.

About Taner Edis

Professor of physics at Truman State University

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/11389651479904502758 DM

    *************************************************************************
    how about I believe in WHATEVER I want – even in the FLYING SPAGHETTI
    MONSTER! – and you have nothing to say!
    *******************************************************************************

    let me show you the end results of this particular *ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENTIFIC MODE*
    of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely divorced from
    any human objectives…

    this style has been perfected by dawkins, pz, randi and the other *NEW ATHEISTS*
    **
    THE BOOBQUAKE – 911!
    ***
    hey, atheists don't even BELIEVE IN BOOBIES!!!
    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

    see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:
    jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE….

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

    see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION – THAT
    OF LIBERATION – not just merely harmless expression…

    Visit for the BOOBQUAKE:

    http://dissidentphilosophy.lifediscussion.net/philosophy-f1/the-boobquake-911-t1310.htm

    ***************************************************

    FSM….

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

    http://i766.photobucket.com/albums/xx302/AtheismPics/fsmlogo.png

    *****************************

    DOUBLE!

    FOR THE WIN…

    *******************************************

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/05693985638589020492 Mark

    Why?

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/11389651479904502758 DM

    Atheists,

    see, you degenerates have last names like first names…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

    *************************************************
    how about I believe in WHATEVER I want – even in the FLYING SPAGHETTI
    MONSTER! – and you have nothing to say!
    *******************************************************************

    let me show you the end results of this particular *ONE-DIMENSIONAL SCIENTIFIC MODE*
    of thinking that is called *CRITICAL THINKING*, which is completely divorced from
    any human objectives…

    this style has been perfected by dawkins, pz, randi and the other *NEW ATHEISTS*
    **
    THE BOOBQUAKE – 911!
    ***
    hey, atheists don't even BELIEVE IN BOOBIES!!!
    they thought BOOBIES had no effect… WRONG!

    see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:
    jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE….

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

    http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html

    see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION – THAT
    OF LIBERATION – not just merely harmless expression…

    Visit for the BOOBQUAKE:

    http://dissidentphilosophy.lifediscussion.net/philosophy-f1/the-boobquake-911-t1310.htm

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/10778996187937943820 Taner Edis

    Mark: "Why? "

    It is possible for me to answer that, but it is not necessary.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/05693985638589020492 Mark

    Physicists showing undue contempt for philosophy is pretty cliché by now. I wish you'd be unduly contemptuous of something else, like archaeology or something.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/05211466026535549638 Bradley Bowen

    Must you? Is this really necessary?

    Conceivably, that is all you have to say on this subject.

    However, I can imagine that you have some sort of point here.

    In any event, my response will be contingent on your making an actual argument, or at least making something that could possibly be an argument; that is to say, an actual series of statements in this world, which in some possible world would constitute an actual argument.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X