Alexander Pruss’s Simple Argument against Divine Command Theories

Here is Pruss’s argument:

1.Even if God didn’t forbid it, torturing the innocent would be wrong.
2.(Premise) Necessarily, torturing the innocent is wrong.
3.(Premise) Possibly, God does not forbid torturing the innocent.
4.(Premise) If divine command theory is true, then it is the case that: necessarily, something is wrong if and only if it is forbidden by God.
5.Therefore, divine command theory is not true.

LINK

"Thanks again Bradley!I take a very different approach to intentionality. I treat it as a ..."

2017 in the Rearview Mirror
"Yeah, I agree with your point."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
""You're probably thinking of Anselm."Thank you for pointing that out. I stand corrected."To be fair ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I am very impressed. There are a lot of theological problems that most Theism suffers ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment