Alexander Pruss’s Simple Argument against Divine Command Theories

Here is Pruss’s argument:

1.Even if God didn’t forbid it, torturing the innocent would be wrong.
2.(Premise) Necessarily, torturing the innocent is wrong.
3.(Premise) Possibly, God does not forbid torturing the innocent.
4.(Premise) If divine command theory is true, then it is the case that: necessarily, something is wrong if and only if it is forbidden by God.
5.Therefore, divine command theory is not true.

LINK

"I'll add something:While the SO has traditionally been interested in focusing on the best proponents ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"My first thought is that the intended audience of the SO is the sort that ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I think it'd be interesting to see one or even multiple SO blog posts responding ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"… to stop the infinite regression …Do you just accept infinite regression (that's one of ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment