The Implausibility of Appealing to the Many-Worlds Hypothesis to Defeat the Fine-Tuning Argument

I know what I am about to write will be controversial among atheists–one of them may (?) be a certain professional physicist who writes regularly for The Secular Outpost–but I have never agreed with the idea of appealing to the hypothesis of multiple universes (“multiverse”) as an objection to the fine-tuning argument for God’s existence. Philosopher Bradley Monton is much more knowledgeable about the intersection of philosophy and physics than I am, so I felt good to discover he has the same concerns I do.


I like the way he begins his post:

Some physicists seem to think that the only good reply to the fine-tuning argument for God is an appeal to many universes. If that’s right, that puts the fine-tuning argument on pretty strong ground.

LINK

FWIW, I posted something to The Secular Outpost about 5 years ago with a link to a sophisticated critique of the multiverse hypothesis. LINK

"I mention Searle because if anyone is performing a bait and switch, then it's him.Putting ..."

Can humans create meaning? Can God?
"I'm all confused now. Neither you or I brought up Professor Searle. It was Professor ..."

Can humans create meaning? Can God?
"I've never seen Searle talk about dogs, but maybe he has. His style of philosophy ..."

Can humans create meaning? Can God?
""I thought about using an example that could be used throughout, but I figured the ..."

Can humans create meaning? Can God?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment