Why Are Members of the Clergy Assumed to be Moral Experts?

At http://www.uncg.edu/~nphuntbu/lectures.html (site now discontinued), I found a set of lecture notes entitled “Why religion is irrelevant to ethics”. Here is a quotation I particularly liked:

Why are members of the clergy (who presumably are experts in the theology of their particular sect) assumed to be experts in ethics? Why put them on ethics ommissions rather than taxi drivers or literature professors?

This issue obviously boils down to presuppositions. If you assume a priori that a member of the clergy is an expert on ethics, the above questions will be a non-starter. If, however, your mind is open to the idea that just because someone is a member of the clergy, they are not automatically qualified to be an expert on ethics, then this question will be more interesting to you.

"Yes. To the extent that an analysis of "change" is made using the idea of ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Good comment thread on youtube version of the debate.https://www.youtube.com/wat..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I'll take the last point first, by providing an example. The words "quadrilateral" and "quadrangle" ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"You are assuming that causation is at base a relation of events. This is an ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment