Why Are Members of the Clergy Assumed to be Moral Experts?

At http://www.uncg.edu/~nphuntbu/lectures.html (site now discontinued), I found a set of lecture notes entitled “Why religion is irrelevant to ethics”. Here is a quotation I particularly liked:

Why are members of the clergy (who presumably are experts in the theology of their particular sect) assumed to be experts in ethics? Why put them on ethics ommissions rather than taxi drivers or literature professors?

This issue obviously boils down to presuppositions. If you assume a priori that a member of the clergy is an expert on ethics, the above questions will be a non-starter. If, however, your mind is open to the idea that just because someone is a member of the clergy, they are not automatically qualified to be an expert on ethics, then this question will be more interesting to you.

"Sidenote: this"men no more need to be taught that there is a God, than that ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"All this logical reasoning seems unnecessary. Something limited can certainly conceive of something perfect without ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Interesting point. I don't think this impacts my assessment of (1b). First of all, I ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I'd like to agree with your argument for 1b against 1a, but you have missed ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment