LINK: Brian Garvey on Absence of Evidence, Evidence of Absence, and the Atheist’s Teapot

Abstract

Atheists often admit that there is no positive evidence for atheism. Many argue that there is nonetheless a prima facie argument, which I will refer to as the ‘teapot argument’. They liken agnosticism to remaining neutral on the existence of a teapot in outer space. The present paper argues that this analogy fails, for the person who denies such a teapot can agree with the person who affirms it regarding every other feature of the world, which is not the case with the atheist vis-a-vis the theist. The atheist is committed to there being an alternative explanation of why the universe exists and is the way it is. Moreover, the analogy relies on assumptions about the prior plausibility of atheism. Hence, the teapot argument fails.

LINK

"I have bought into the tentative, evidence based, hypothesis forming of Popper's empiricism. I start ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"For the record, I would call myself a dualist who is not committed to any ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"dcleve, thanks for responding. So it seems you are a bonafied Cartesian substance dualist! That's ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Jayman,Thanks for your thoughtful response. First, a bit of a clarification: I am not myself ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment