LINK: Brian Garvey on Absence of Evidence, Evidence of Absence, and the Atheist’s Teapot

Abstract

Atheists often admit that there is no positive evidence for atheism. Many argue that there is nonetheless a prima facie argument, which I will refer to as the ‘teapot argument’. They liken agnosticism to remaining neutral on the existence of a teapot in outer space. The present paper argues that this analogy fails, for the person who denies such a teapot can agree with the person who affirms it regarding every other feature of the world, which is not the case with the atheist vis-a-vis the theist. The atheist is committed to there being an alternative explanation of why the universe exists and is the way it is. Moreover, the analogy relies on assumptions about the prior plausibility of atheism. Hence, the teapot argument fails.

LINK

"When I think of Perfect, which is what the initial argument was based on, I ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Why do you presume these are the only two options?I … don't. Secular individualism and ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"p.s.Hello again,Please consider my sincere apologies for the unfair imputation, and also my tone. Nasty ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
""The facts you list are generally not at issue in POE or POO debates."If this ..."

Problems With TASO – Part 2: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment