Baggini on selective mystery

Just in case Julian Baggini fails to promote his latest Heathen’s Progress article, here’s the link: ‘You just don’t understand my religion’ is not good enough. And here is the best part:

Too often I find that faith is mysterious only selectively. Believers constantly attribute all sorts of qualities to their gods and have a list of doctrines as long as your arm. It is only when the questions get tough that, suddenly, their God disappears in a puff of mystery. Ineffability becomes a kind of invisibility cloak, only worn when there is a need to get out of a bit of philosophical bother.

A fine description of an all-too-common experience. I detect a hint of Schopenhauer, and undertones of oak.

"What's an example of something being bad even when an agent wants it?"

The sense in which pain is ..."
"To try again:That something is painful doesn't necessitate whether it is wanted. (Even though, for ..."

The sense in which pain is ..."
"You said, “The nature of Φ gives us reasons to want that Φ not occur ..."

The sense in which pain is ..."
"I'm hoping you will do that.I did below, but it may have gotten lost in ..."

The sense in which pain is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment