Louise Antony on Obedience to God

Obedience to such a God [i.e., the vengeful, despotic God depicted in the pages of the Hebrew Bible] would not be morally virtuous; it would be, at best, prudent. One does not owe allegiance to another being simply because that being is stronger. And it does not matter if the being in question is responsible for your very existence. No one thinks that an abused child is morally obliged to obey an abusive parent, simply because the parent gave the child life. Parents do not own their children, and their right to expect obedience is contingent upon their being benevolent and comptent trustees of the child’s own welfare.

Louise Antony, “Atheism as Perfect Piety,” in Robert K. Garcia and Nathan L. King, eds., Is Goodness without God Good Enough? A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009), 80.

"I have never said any of the arguments are irrelevant (don't matter). I have complimented ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Joe, mind reading is just knowing what another person is thinking, or knowing what sort ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Sure we can know that some experienced refereed to by a test subjects a feeling ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"Yes. Your demand for evidence and good reasons is especially weighty because of the pressing ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment