Gervais and Norenzayan: Analytical Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief

Abstract: Scientific interest in the cognitive underpinnings of religious belief has grown in recent years. However, to date, little experimental research has focused on the cognitive processes that may promote religious disbelief. The present studies apply a dual-process model of cognitive processing to this problem, testing the hypothesis that analytic processing promotes religious disbelief. Individual differences in the tendency to analytically override initially flawed intuitions in reasoning were associated with increased religious disbelief. Four additional experiments provided evidence of causation, as subtle manipulations known to trigger analytic processing also encouraged religious disbelief. Combined, these studies indicate that analytic processing is one factor (presumably among several) that promotes religious disbelief. Although these findings do not speak directly to conversations about the inherent rationality, value, or truth of religious beliefs, they illuminate one cognitive factor that may influence such discussions.


LINK

The above link is one of the studies which was the basis for a Scientific American article entitled, “How Critical Thinkers Lose Faith in God.”

Aside: Trent Dougherty at Prosblogion did not care for the Scientific American article at all.

"Very good.Ficino is; 1. Highlighting a post that is examining an argument of Kreeft against ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"In end note 9 you can see where Swinburne notes a distinction between Aquinas' use ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I did not allegedly read it,I read it, I misinterpreted his meaning, that happens doesn't ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I use "Concrete" as Peter van Inwagen would when he says God is a concrete ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment