Index: Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence

Part 1: The Bayesian Interpretation of ECREE“: a Bayesian interpretation and defense of ECREE
Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig“: Craig’s objection to ECREE is based upon an misinterpretation of ECREE.

Part 3: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Kurt Jaros“: ECREE emphasizes the common sense notion that the more implausible (i.e., antecedently improbable) we initially regard a claim prior to considering the evidence, the greater the evidence we will require to believe the claim.
Part 4: NT Reliability, Extraordinary Claims, and the Base Rate Fallacy“: arguments for miracles based solely on the general historical reliability of the New Testament commit the base rate fallacy.
Part 5: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Greg Koukl and Melinda Penner“: the Bayesian interpretation of ECREE shows why Koukl’s objections to ECREE are misguided
Part 6: Is ECREE False? A Reply to Greg Koukl and Melinda Penner (continued)
Part 7: Christian Apologist Glenn Miller Agrees!” 

"Sure. It's hardly atheism alone that gets conflated.When treating a symptom, I try and find ..."

ATHEISM 101
"Still no evidence of the existence of gods.."

Letter to Peter Kreeft
"Sure. It's hardly atheism alone that gets conflated.I don't know how much must exist or ..."

ATHEISM 101
"If Kreeft responds to my letter with some actual clarification, then I will ask for ..."

Letter to Peter Kreeft

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment