J. Brian Pitts: Why the Big Bang Singularity Does Not Help the Kalam Cosmological Argument for Theism

Abstract: The cosmic singularity provides negligible evidence for creation in the finite past, and hence theism. A physical theory might have no metric or multiple metrics, so a ‘beginning’ must involve a first moment, not just finite age. Whether one dismisses singularities or takes them seriously, physics licenses no first moment. The analogy between the Big Bang and stellar gravitational collapse indicates that a Creator is required in the first case only if a Destroyer is needed in the second. The need for and progress in quantum gravity and the underdetermination of theories by data make it difficult to take singularities seriously. The singularity exemplifies the sort of gap that is likely to be closed by scientific progress, obviating special divine action. The apparent irrelevance of cardinality to practices of counting infinite sets in classical field theory and Fourier analysis is noted.


"Many of my posts in this series are a bit like eating granola for breakfast. ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Peter,Thanks for your comments. I too would have liked to have had continued conversations with ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."
"Since I have not at this point heard back from Dianelos, I have done a ..."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."
"Yes, the isolated demand for rigour is one of his favourites."

Richard Dawkins, Stephen Hawking, and a ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment