Texas Veterinarian Claims to Have DNA Evidence of Bigfoot

(While this has little or nothing to do with metaphysical naturalism, my hunch is that most readers will find this of interest.)

A Texas veterinarian claims to have DNA evidence of Bigfoot.

ad more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/11/27/bigfoot-is-part-human-dna-study-claims/?intcmp=features#ixzz2DV6PPiL1
Genetic testing confirms the legendary Bigfoot is a human relative that arose some 15,000 years ago — at least according to a press release issued by a company called DNA Diagnostics detailing supposed work by a Texas veterinarian.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/11/27/bigfoot-is-part-human-dna-study-claims/?intcmp=features#ixzz2DV6PPiL1 Here is a link to the press release:

LINK

And here is a link to an article at FoxNews.com written by a skeptic affiliated with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSICOP).

LINK

I think it would be very cool if this evidence held up under scrutiny. But given the track record of past claims of evidence for Bigfoot, I’m not going to get my hopes up.

ETA: I just stumbled across an article at StatesmanJournal.com which provides some very interesting additional details/claims.

LINK

"I don't know whether somewhere in the book he works out a rigorous definition of ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I dont know.WLC holds to the possibility of causes preceeding their effects as well as ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Thanks for the quote. How is he defining "event"? It sounds like he's using the ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"On propagation delay and how it's not a problem, Feser writes:"... it is simply a ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment