William Lane Craig’s silly views on animal pain further debunked

This brand new video exposes in some detail the absurdity of William Lane Craig’s ongoing attempt to defend his silly, unscientific views regarding animal pain (his view is that animals other than higher primates are unaware they have it – which is a great comfort to animal lovers like himself).

 

This video responds to Craig’s response to the original video exposing the sheer ridiculousness of the argument he used against me in our debate:

 

 

Video is not by me, btw.

 

Here is my earlier post on this subject.

Adamson's Cru[de] Arguments for God - Part 3
Naturalism, Theism, and Moral Ontology: A Reply to William Lane Craig
Moral Arguments for God and Coining a Name for a Common but Fallacious Objection
We Don't Have Father-ist Apologetics; Why Do We Need Theistic Apologetics?
About Stephen Law

CLOSE | X

HIDE | X