Mark Douglas Seward: Fine-tuning as Evidence for a Multiverse: Why White is Wrong

Abstract

Roger White (God and design, Routledge, London, 2003) claims that while the fine-tuning of our universe, α , may count as evidence for a designer, it cannot count as evidence for a multiverse. First, I will argue that his considerations are only correct, if at all, for a limited set of multiverses that have particular features. As a result, I will argue that his claim cannot be generalised as a statement about all multiverses. This failure to generalise, I will argue, is also a feature of design hypotheses. That is, design hypotheses can likewise be made insensitive or sensitive to the evidence of fine-tuning as we please. Second, I will argue that White is mistaken about the role that this evidence plays in fine-tuning discussions. That is, even if the evidence of fine-tuning appears to support one particular hypothesis more strongly than another, this does not always help us in deciding which hypothesis to prefer.

LINK

If a PDF version of this were to magically arrive in my inbox, I wouldn’t mind at all.

"My only exposure to Haidt has been his talk to the high school, which was ..."

Tim Crane on Religious Violence
"Dr. Parsons, it's an odd experience for someone to tell me I write tersely! Usually ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"My only exposure to Haidt has been his talk to the high school, which was ..."

Tim Crane on Religious Violence
"I reject the inference from e3 to g, as the rationale is not presented. The ..."

Problems With TASO – Part 2: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment