A Simple Post about Transubstantiation

With all the news about the new Pope, I’ve been thinking about the doctrinal differences between Catholics and Protestants. I do not come from a Catholic background, but one thing I’ve never understood is the doctrine of transubstantiation.

First, other than Catholic tradition or dogma, what reason is there to think the doctrine is actually true?

Second, since Catholics do believe it is true, why don’t they also consider themselves to be practicing cannibalism–the eating of the flesh of another person–every time they eat the flesh and drink the blood of Christ? And, even if they have some way to get around the label of cannibalism, from a purely subjective point of view, this doctrine is literally disgusting to me. If I were a Catholic and believed transubstantiation, every time I took the Eucharist I would be grossed out.

"While this isn't on topic, I'll allow it just once. The answer to your question ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."
"Superman is greater than human beings.15. The idea of Superman must have been caused by ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Causing an idea of X is quite different from causing X: and that X is ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Luke Breuer said:Assert that value doesn't really exist and you cannot detect the causal powers ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment