Randal Rauser Replies

His post: Do naturalists have more to lose? If not, why are they crucifying Thomas Nagel?  In order to prevent this from becoming a back-and-forth mess, I’ve replied in the comments there. He’s a good guy, so I don’t mind sending him more traffic. If you’re interested, the discussion can continue there.

Richard Gale: "The Kalam Cosmological Argument Isn't Taken Seriously"
Poll: Would You Be Interested in a Secular Outpost Podcast?
Lydia McGrew on Biblical Inerrancy, Licona, and Apparent Contradictions
William Lane Craig on the Prior Probability of Theism and the Fine-Tuning Argument
About Matt DeStefano

Matt is pursuing his PhD in Philosophy at the University of Arizona.