Randal Rauser Replies

His post: Do naturalists have more to lose? If not, why are they crucifying Thomas Nagel?  In order to prevent this from becoming a back-and-forth mess, I’ve replied in the comments there. He’s a good guy, so I don’t mind sending him more traffic. If you’re interested, the discussion can continue there.

"I'm more so saying this particular forum is not the place to discuss psychological arguments ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Keith:1) Pinker rewtweeted your article: https://twitter.com/sapinke...2) Great to "hear from you" via the article! (https://twitter.com/jwardne..."

Conservative Pundit Ross Douthat Takes on ..."
"Your discussion has been very interestting and it doesn't surprise me that you got so ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Actually psychological arguments are what we should be examining. It isn't enough to know what ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment