Darwin Proofing

Students say the darndest things. In their exams, no less. In one of my classes students were required to read selections from Darwin’s Origin and Descent of Man. Here are some comments from one exam: “I found Darwin’s The Descent of Man hard to read and hard to understand. As a Christian I have always been taught to just ignore Darwin’s work and I believe that played a large part in why I had trouble understanding what I was reading.”

Wow. I think it was H.L. Mencken who said (paraphrasing) that it is hard to make someone understand if that person’s livelihood depends upon not understanding. A fortiori, if a person’s salvation depends upon not understanding, then that person will have a very hard time understanding. I appreciated the honesty of the student’s comments. It is eloquent testimony to how effective fundamentalism has been in making people Darwin proof. Arguing against Darwin because you think he is wrong is one thing. Making it harder for young people to understand Darwin at all is something else altogether.

To affect people’s minds so that they have a harder time understanding important ideas is, effectively, to lower their intelligence. It makes people selectively stupid. This is why fundamentalism, and other pernicious ideologies, are so opposed to reason. It is not just that their positive dogmas are irrational, which they are; it is their appalling effectiveness in undermining the very capacity for rational thought. Fundamentalism induces the mental equivalent of plugging one’s ears and shouting “la, la, la, la…not listening” when somebody say something you don’t want to hear.

Yet Another Atheist Misrepresents a Theistic Argument (the Leibnizian Cosmological Argument)
Response to William Lane Craig - Part 11
Moreland: Christians are biased, but less biased than naturalists
William Lane Craig Admits His Debate Quotations of Anthony Kenny Are Misleading
About Keith Parsons