Index for Feser-Parsons Exchanges

The purpose of this blog post is simply to provide a convenient index to all of the posts in the planned two series of exchanges between Edward Feser and Keith Parsons. Feser’s contributions will be posted on his blog and Parsons’ contributions will be posted on The Secular Outpost.

This post will be updated with links as as they become available.

Exchange #1: Feser’s Four Questions for Parsons

Feser’s Initial Statement: “Four Questions for Keith Parsons

Parsons’ Initial Response:

Feser’s Counter-Response:

Parsons’ Counter-Response:

Exchange #2: Debate: “Can morality have a rational justification if atheism or naturalism is true?”

Feser’s Opening Statement: “A Second Exchange with Keith Parsons, Part I

Parsons’ Opening Statement: “Morality and Atheism: An Exchange with Prof Feser

Feser’s Response: “A Second Exchange with Keith Parsons, Part II

Parsons’ Response: “Belated Response to Ed Feser

"Why not just say, "If Tom is not trying to achieve something (at all!) by ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."
"You said, "But that a person has a motive to do something does not imply ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."
"Does "In virtue of what" mean "why"? If not, what does that phrase mean for ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."
"Why isn't a motive also (or basically) a reason for doing something? Having a desire ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment