Spot the Fallacy #2: Fine-Tuning and the Prior Probability of Theism

Note: This post is another post in our series of articles designed to engage non-philosophers. Despite the title, you don’t need to literally name a fallacy assuming there is one. What these posts are really designed to do is to get you to describe, in plain English, why the argument (or objection) presented isn’t successful.

Instructions:

1. Read William Lane Craig’s Q&A here.

2. If you are not a philosopher, explain in the combox why his response doesn’t work.

"Theism is not just one more God. That idea asserts that belief in God is ..."

I’ve Got One Less Prophet Without ..."
"You seem to be making a connection I can't see any reason for. You seem ..."

A Simple and Obvious Explanation
"Are you really willing to construe wrong doing as a proof of no God? Where ..."

A Simple and Obvious Explanation
"Excellent example of a Christian critique of Islam!The defender of Islam clearly points out the ..."

I’ve Got One Less Prophet Without ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment