Does Atheism Undercut the Case for Equal Human Rights?

Philosopher Victor Reppert thinks so.  I’m not certain, but I think his argument for this claim is supposed to be found in an earlier post of his. At the same time, Reppert, like the overwhelming majority of theists who write about such topics, completely glosses over what atheist intellectuals who specialize in the topic have written. (The writings of Erik Wielenberg would be a great place to start.)

I’d have more respect for Reppert’s argument if he at least gave the appearance of interacting with his dialectical opponents. But, at least in this case, he didn’t do that. What he’s done is no more respectable than, say, an atheist giving an argument from evil and completely ignoring all defenses and theodicies.

"The belief that God exists does NOT imply that there are no gods nor does ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God: Summary of ..."
"I spent considerable effort explaining the sense in which pain is bad. I do not ..."

The sense in which pain is ..."
"In virtue of what does Tom's desire that radios be turned on count in favor ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."
"Why did X turn on all the radios? Because he wanted them all on! That ..."

Do our reasons depend on our ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment