Dianelos on the Moral Argument

Dianelos Georgoudis, in reply to my post “Atheism Debunked! Again!,” has conveniently and succinctly offered both “conceptual” and a “practical” moral arguments for theism. I take the liberty of putting the first of these in premise/conclusion format and try to express it a bit more rigorously. I do hope I have not distorted his meaning. For his original wording, please see the comments section of the earlier post.The Conceptual Argument:1) For naturalists, that is, those who believe that the nat … [Read more...]

Atheism Debunked! Again!

On his Dangerous Idea blog Victor Reppert refers to a 2007 article by Washington Post writer Michael Gerson: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/12/AR2007071201620.html I did not see this article at the time, and my reason for commenting on it now is that the arguments it gives are ones we have heard many times and ones that will be heard again ad nauseam. Though hackneyed in the extreme, these arguments need to be addressed again and again, and their … [Read more...]

Social changes that may undermine nonbelief

Standard accounts of secularization emphasize how social changes that led to the modern world undermine organized religion. Few people actively wanted religion to become a more private affair – secularization has always proceeded against a background of shirt-rending about the erosion of public morality. And few were affected by intellectual critiques of religion. Science, for example, had little to do with the European decline of organized religion except in an indirect sense, where s … [Read more...]

The Sound Of Science

[Read more...]

Freethinkers: A source guide

Religionlink.com has just put up "Freethinkers: A source guide to atheists, humanists and other nontheists." It's intended as a resource guide for journalists interested in various forms of nonbelief, but it's useful for other purposes as well. It's worth a quick look. … [Read more...]

More on Theistic Explanation

The discussion following my earlier post on "the hard problem" has gone on at rather great length, and has broached a number of topics. One of those topics has been theistic explanation, and Alex Dalton and Dianelos Georgoudis have raised some points that need further argument and clarification. First, when, if ever, would a rational atheist such as (ahem) myself be driven, "as a last resort" to admit that something is inexplicable on naturalistic terms and concede that it must be due to the … [Read more...]

St Louis “Skeptics in the Pub”

I'll be in St Louis on October 22, speaking at a "Skeptics in the Pub" event. It'll be about Islam and science, particularly Muslim creationism.It should be interesting. … [Read more...]

Neoconservatism and critics of Islam

Ibn Warraq, the well-known critic of Islam and author and editor of books such as Why I Am Not A Muslim, has left the Center for Inquiry to join the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a neoconservative Washington DC think tank. [Thanks to David Harding for pointing this out to me.]There is an interesting tendency for the most vociferous critics of Islam to get wrapped up in neoconservative politics. Perhaps (and I can only speculate here) this has to do with the tendency for both popular … [Read more...]