LINK: Alonzo Fyfe on Wielenberg’s Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe

Just discovered this and sharing the link without taking a position on its arguments.LINK -- Fyfe's comments are located near the bottom of the page (HT: Luke Muelhauser) … [Read more...]

Catalog of Bayesian Arguments in Philosophy of Religion

I've created a new page, with a permanent link near the top of the screen, to a catalog of Bayesian arguments in the philosophy of religion, including Bayesian arguments for and against God's existence. This is a work-in-progress, so please leave a comment on that page to let me know of any additions, edits, etc. I need to make. … [Read more...]

Repost: Shameless Self-Promotion of My Debate with Phil Fernandes

This is a re-post. Please pardon the shameless self-promotion, but the video of my 1999 debate with Phil Fernandes on naturalism vs. theism was uploaded to YouTube some time ago. If you haven't already seen it, I invite you to view it here: … [Read more...]

Probabilities and Ultimate Posits

Victor Reppert has a short essay on his Dangerous Idea blog on the use of probability arguments in the philosophy of religion. Here I would like to offer my own take on the question. A principle often invoked by theists making probability arguments is what Robin Collins calls the “prime principle of confirmation (PPC),” which he defines as follows:Simply put, the principle says that whenever we are considering two competing hypotheses, an observation counts as evidence in favor of the hypothesis … [Read more...]

LINK: Alvin Plantinga’s Turnaround Argument from Evil

LINK (HT: Victor Reppert) … [Read more...]

What Are The Best Arguments for the Non-Existence of God?

In a recent interview with Christian philosopher and apologist Douglas Groothius, Lee Strobel asks, "What’s the strongest argument in the arsenal of atheists these days? And why does it fall short?" Groothius answers:That’s a big question. Different atheists will use different arguments, but they often confront Christians with two things: (1) Darwinism has refuted the idea of Designer and so defeats Christianity (and every other form of theism). They claim that undirected, purely material causes … [Read more...]

LINK: Stephen Law’s Evil-God Challenge

In his recent debate with William Lane Craig, Stephen Law presented his evil God challenge. Law had formally documented this challenge in a 2009 article in the academic journal Religious Studies. Here is the abstract:Abstract: This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-good god should be considered significantly more reasonable than the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and … [Read more...]

Flanagan’s Response to Me (Re: Jerry Coyne on Explaining Morality)

Matthew Flanagan has written a response to my post on Jerry Coyne and explaining morality. I am quoting his response in its entirety, with Flannagan's permission. Hi Jeffery, I tried posting this on your site but couldn’t, feel free to do so. You write: ”I suspect that C.S. Lewis’ moral argument for God’s existence is probably much more influential among the average reader of USA Today than the work of Robert Adams. And Lewis does appeal to a variety of moral phenomena in in Mere Christianity as … [Read more...]