LINK: Atheist Ethicist: Atheists Speaking about Morality

This is an old post by Alonzo Fyfe, but one not previously mentioned on The Secular Outpost, where he critiques atheists who have spoken about morality. Atheist Ethicist: Atheists Speaking about Morality

LINK: Alonzo Fyfe on Wielenberg’s Value and Virtue in a Godless Universe

Just discovered this and sharing the link without taking a position on its arguments. LINK — Fyfe’s comments are located near the bottom of the page (HT: Luke Muelhauser)

Catalog of Bayesian Arguments in Philosophy of Religion

I’ve created a new page, with a permanent link near the top of the screen, to a catalog of Bayesian arguments in the philosophy of religion, including Bayesian arguments for and against God’s existence. This is a work-in-progress, so please leave a comment on that page to let me know of any additions, edits, etc. I need to make.

Repost: Shameless Self-Promotion of My Debate with Phil Fernandes

This is a re-post. Please pardon the shameless self-promotion, but the video of my 1999 debate with Phil Fernandes on naturalism vs. theism was uploaded to YouTube some time ago. If you haven’t already seen it, I invite you to view it here:

Probabilities and Ultimate Posits

Victor Reppert has a short essay on his Dangerous Idea blog on the use of probability arguments in the philosophy of religion. Here I would like to offer my own take on the question. A principle often invoked by theists making probability arguments is what Robin Collins calls the “prime principle of confirmation (PPC),” which he defines as follows: Simply put, the principle says that whenever we are considering two competing hypotheses, an observation counts as evidence in favor of... Read more

LINK: Stephen Law’s Evil-God Challenge

In his recent debate with William Lane Craig, Stephen Law presented his evil God challenge. Law had formally documented this challenge in a 2009 article in the academic journal Religious Studies. Here is the abstract: Abstract: This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-good god should be considered significantly more reasonable than the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-evil god. Theists typically... Read more

Flanagan’s Response to Me (Re: Jerry Coyne on Explaining Morality)

Matthew Flanagan has written a response to my post on Jerry Coyne and explaining morality. I am quoting his response in its entirety, with Flannagan’s permission. Hi Jeffery, I tried posting this on your site but couldn’t, feel free to do so. You write: ”I suspect that C.S. Lewis’ moral argument for God’s existence is probably much more influential among the average reader of USA Today than the work of Robert Adams. And Lewis does appeal to a variety of... Read more

Extreme Unfriendly Theism or Abusive Theism

(This is another item in the “not new, but new for me” category. I was familiar with presuppositionalism, but not this particular presuppositionalist. Based on how radical Cheung’s position is, I guess you could also place this in the “you can’t make this stuff up” category.) Vincent Cheung is a Christian apologist of the presuppositionalist variety. His website includes two articles which defend his calling all non-Christians “morons”: Professional Morons A Moron By Any Other Name In this post, I am... Read more

LINK: Kohl Reviews Wielenberg’s God and the Reach of Reason


Please Welcome Stephen Law to the Secular Outpost

I am very pleased to announce that Stephen Law has graciously agreed to join The Secular Outpost as a contributor. Stephen is the editor of the Royal Institute of Philosophy journal THINK. He has published several books, including Humanism: A Very Short Introduction, Believing Bullshit, The Philosophy Gym, The Philosophy Files, and The War for Children’s Minds. He is senior lecturer in philosophy at Heythrop College, University of London. Please join me in giving Stephen a warm welcome!