Probabilistic Arguments for the Existence of God: James Croft Vs. David Glass on ‘Unbelievable?’

Last week I appeared for the third time on Premier Christian Radio’s discussion show Unbelievable?, hosted by Justin Brierley. This time I was speaking with David Glass (a Lecturer in the University of Ulster’s School of Computing and Mathematics) about his new book, Atheism’s New Clothes: Exploring and Exposing the Claims of the New AtheistsWe focus most on the probabilistic arguments for god Glass offers, which I think are way off-base.

Listen to the discussion here!

You can also listen to me first and second appearances on the show:

Unbelievable? Show with Chris Sinkinson: Is Apologetics a Waste of Time?

Unbelievable? Show with Ken Samples: Was Jesus Liar, Lunatic or Lord? CS Lewis’ Apologetics

About James Croft

James Croft is a Humanist activist and public speaker who has swiftly become one of the best-known new faces in Humanism today. He is a graduate of the Universities of Cambridge and Harvard, and is currently studying for his Doctorate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. As a leader in training in the Ethical Culture movement – a national movement of Humanist congregations – he is an in-demand public speaker, an engaging teacher, and a passionate activist for human rights. James was raised on Shakespeare, Sagan and Star Trek, and is a proud, gay Humanist. His upcoming book "The Godless Congregation", co-authored with New York Times bestselling author Greg Epstein, is being published by Simon & Schuster.

  • Pingback: Welcome James Croft!

  • Baal

    I tried to listen by the audio wasn’t tolerable (for me).

    • James Croft

      Hmm I’ll check that.

  • David

    It was that podcast that made me aware of your activities. I look forward to following your blog.

    • James Croft

      Glad to have you here David!

  • olly

    James. You were outstanding on this show – you didn’t let him get Away with anything. Your precision meant that for once you weren’t Talking past each other. becuase you listened carefully to what he had to say, then impelled him to defend his assumptions – which are too often implicit or go unchallenged. he Was metaphorically on the ropes by the end. Furthermore you are unfaiingly polite, at The same time without taking a backward Step in launching an assault on the wooly theistic Thinking. A bravura performance. More to come I Hope.

  • Pingback: Desire Matters, Truth Matters More – Alex Gabriel and Jeff Cook on “Unbelievable?”

  • Pingback: Countdown to 30 – 2 Days to Go! – Humanist Activist


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X