NSS welcomes court ruling on school's gender apartheid

NSS welcomes court ruling on school's gender apartheid October 13, 2017

The National Secular Society has welcomed a landmark ruling in the Court of Appeal that an Islamic school’s policy of segregating boys from girls amounted to unlawful sex discrimination.
Al-Hijrah School, a state-funded Islamic school in Birmingham, admits pupils of both sexes. But from year five boys and girls are completely segregated for religious reasons for all lessons, break and lunchtimes, school trips and school clubs.
NSS campaigns director Stephen Evans said:

This is excellent news for young British girls from Muslim backgrounds. The court has struck an important blow for gender equality.
The policy of segregation in this school was not benign. It was based on the notion of female inferiority. It was shocking, for example, that books in the library suggested husbands could beat and expect obedience from their wives.
Our society is often too slow to condemn discrimination when it comes cloaked in religion, particularly Islam. But gender apartheid is an assault on women’s rights and dignity. We hope this sets a precedent and others will stand up to the fundamentalist mindset, rather than tolerating harmful and regressive practices under the cloak of religious or cultural sensitivity.

Three judges overturned last year’s finding by the High Court that Ofsted inspectors were wrong to penalise the school, on the basis of an “erroneous” view that segregation amounted to unlawful discrimination.

The judges unanimously allowed a challenge by Ofsted’s chief inspector Amanda Spielman, above, against the High Court’s decision. Ofsted’s lawyers argued the segregation left girls:

Unprepared for life in modern Britain.

The ruling means Ofsted will be able to penalise Islamic and other faith schools if they continue to practice gender segregation in future. There are approximately 20 faith schools that teach boys and girls separately.
Speaking after the ruling, Spielman said it would set a precedent for future inspections.

I am delighted that we have won this appeal. Ofsted’s job is to make sure that all schools properly prepare children for life in modern Britain. Educational institutions should never treat pupils less favourably because of their sex, or for any other reason.
The school is teaching boys and girls entirely separately, making them walk down separate corridors, and keeping them apart at all times.
This is discrimination and is wrong. It places these boys and girls at a disadvantage for life beyond the classroom and the workplace, and fails to prepare them for life in modern Britain.

She added:

This case involves issues of real public interest, and has significant implications for gender equality, Ofsted, government, and the wider education sector. We will be considering the ruling carefully to understand how this will affect future inspections.

Last year Ofsted inspectors visited the school and raised concerns about many leadership failings, including “too heavy involvement” by governors in the day-to-day running of the school, and concerns over gender segregation. They said the school had an unchallenged culture of discrimination against girls and LGBT+ people.
They also found religious books promoting rape, violence against women and misogynistic attitudes in the school library. Among them were books stating that a husband can beat his wife and insist on having sex with her. Some girls anonymously complained that gender segregation was hindering their ability to integrate into wider society.
In November a judge ruled that Ofsted had been wrong to punish the school for segregating its pupils, on the grounds that the children were “separated equally”.
The National Secular Society campaigned against this ruling, writing to Ofsted urge them to appeal. The NSS also supported interventions by two women’s groups, Southall Black Sisters and Inspire, which highlighted the role that Islamist ideology was playing at the schools.
Pragna Patel of Southall Black Sisters called the ruling:

A vital step forward in our effort to persuade the courts and state bodies to take account of the reality of the misogyny and gender stereotyping that is promoted in our schools and universities in the name of religious and cultural freedom.

Sara Khan of Inspire said:

I hope this serves as a reminder that equality and the rights of women and girls especially from minority communities must not be sacrificed in the name of culture or religion.

A Guardian report said the ruling is likely to impact on other schools, including several Orthodox Jewish and Christian faith schools.
Hat tip: BarrieJohn

"The head wound didn't kill him, but rest assured folks, Bill Donohue is a grouchy ..."

Christian propaganda movie Gosnell hits a ..."
"I can't hear you over the sound of my gaaaaaay."

Pope’s ‘rainbow’ cross considered by many ..."
"Oh Lets use their same 'LOGIC' here. Since we have SOOO many cases of Catholic ..."

Christian propaganda movie Gosnell hits a ..."
"He would have to take it out of disrepute first to bring it back into ..."

SA pastor who says dog meat ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Broga

    Perhaps there can now be more vigorous action on FGM? Or would that be a step too far?

  • 1859

    Good news indeed. However, if the classes in these ‘faith’ schools do become mixed gender, would the teachers insist that boys sit separately from the girls, or would the pupils be allowed to sit next to each other if they so wished?
    The whole notion of schools run on the basis of ‘faith’ is obnoxious – it’s sectarianism all over again. Will the Brits only ever learn how obscene such divisions are when there are bodies lying in the streets?
    Maybe not even then.

  • Welt

    Didn’t the troubles in Northern Ireland, troubles with their root in bigoted and bloody interfaith hatred, teach our leaders anything? Faith’s are mutually intolerant and divisive. Even the notion of faith schools is repulsive and that we allow tax funded islamic schools to exist is an abomination. Bluntly I am paying, with my hard earned taxes, to fund the indoctrination of impressionable children with the belief that I as a non believer is unworthy of respect and deserving of violent death at the hands of a jihadist bent upon a fast track ticket to an afterlife of raping a bunch of prepubescent virgins.

  • Brian Jordan

    Are single-sex schools considered discriminatory (in its modern, pejorative meaning)? Either way, there is an inconsistency here.

  • barriejohn
  • Brian Jordan

    Without even the slightest whiff of hypocrisy – honest – the Chief Inspector of OFSTED explains here that segregating boys and girls is a Very Good Thing. Provided it’s done by separating the schools, not separating the pupils.
    And surely she’s not saying that primarily girls should get their own schools but it’s only a useful byproduct that boys do to?