Christian couple lose custody case. Jesus was their lawyer.

Christian couple lose custody case. Jesus was their lawyer. June 8, 2018

In one of the weirdest performances ever seen in a court of law, the deranged parents of a toddler spoke in tongues and used a stuffed lion as an interlocutor to argue that anti-Christian bias led to their toddler being placed in foster care.
According to this report, the couple – known as AJ and DK –  this week came before a British Columbia Supreme Court judge, Justice Diane MacDonald, to challenge the removal their child by speaking in tongues to the lion that they claimed was giving them direct counsel from God.
They rejected legal aid, preferring to advise witnesses:

It was their lawyer Jesus Christ asking the questions through the voice of the parent.

Alarm bells sounded shortly after the child – whom the mother wants to rename Jesus JoyoftheLord – was born in 2016.
The baby – CJ – was delivered in a home birth on November 1, 2016, with the help of a paramedic called by AJ’s anxious parents.
The young mother refused a host of medical procedures, including eye drops for the baby, a bilirubin blood test and a hearing test. She also:

Expressed unwillingness to allow the child to receive vaccinations.

Concerns had been expressed about AJ’s mental health and DK’s potential for violence. A specialist was assigned to work with the family, and the baby was placed in voluntary care with foster parents.
At the age of one month, AJ and DK took custody again, but just two weeks later the child was formally removed from the home as she was losing weight and AJ refused to give her anything but breast milk.
The original custody trial saw the Director of Child, Family and Community services argue that concerns over mental health, violence and medical care rendered AJ and DK incapable of caring for their baby.
The couple took the position:

That there are no child protection issues and that they are being persecuted for their deeply held Christian beliefs.

Even as the parents prepared for the initial trial to determine custody, the pastor of one church sought a restraining order against them.
The pair were criminally charged after a disturbance at another church in West Kelowna.
The original hearing was told that:

DK co-operated with the arrest but AJ rolled around on the ground and did not co-operate. The parents allegedly wanted to cleanse the church of evil influences.

In rejecting the couple’s challenge, MacDonald said she could find no error of law or discrimination in the original custody ruling. Rather, she found a decision made in the best interests of the child.
MacDonald’s review of the case was limited to errors of law, but she noted that the trial judge went so far as to state that:

He, himself, was a Christian and did not have any issue with their Christian family values.

She added:

This is a difficult case. The parents obviously love their child and wish to raise her in a home with their Christian values.

MacDonald’s ruling details a troubling history that has seen the couple move from community to community after alienating others in efforts to purge churches of “evil influences”.
MacDonald also went to great pains to establish what the trial was and was not about.

I restate that this hearing is not about the parent’s freedom of religion. Christianity is not on trial. The parent’s belief in direct revelation from God or in using the gift of tongues is not on trial. Home birthing is not on trial. The right not to use vaccinations or have one’s child not use vaccinations is not on trial.

The Ministry of Children and Family Development got involved with AJ and DK in 2016 after AJ told a facilitator at a lunch programme that DK had choked her and:

Believes sexual relations between children should be encouraged.

She would later deny making the disclosure, but the reports raised red flags because AJ was pregnant.

"...and distracts attention away from the longstanding insanity of reich-wing Christianity. We'll need a thousand ..."

Exorcist plans counter-attack against witches cursing ..."
"They look like the sort of couple that you just wouldn't want to be stuck ..."

Lights, camera, inaction! Christian bigots won’t ..."
"Yeah Kev, sure. Maybe one of your demonic contacts can recommend a shrink.You can "remote ..."

Exorcist plans counter-attack against witches cursing ..."
"Another ass ripped liberal destroyed by the power of MAGA and magnificently cucked by the ..."

Exorcist plans counter-attack against witches cursing ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • andym
  • Charlie

    Lunatics … its that simple.

  • Broga

    Driven mad by religious belief.

  • tonye

    Out of curiosity, how much does their ‘lawyer Jesus Christ’ charge by the hour?
    Am I right in saying that speaking in tongues is a relatively new invention?

  • Marcus

    Reminds me of the joke about God and Satan having a furious row. After Satan accuses God of being a megalomaniac and a mass murderer to boot, the Almighty says “Right, sunshine, that’s it! I’m gonna sue your sorry arse for slander!”
    The Devil raises an eyebrow are retorts “Just where in Heaven do you think you’ll find a lawyer?”

  • AgentCormac

    AJ and DK: Absolute Jerk and Deviant Knobhead. The pair of them should be locked up and their child taken into care to protect her from these deranged, deluded and dangerous people.
    And as for the judge declaring he is a godbot lunatic himself – how does that uphold the separation of state and church? Surely he isn’t actually allowed to announce that he empathises with the defendants? You only have to wonder what kind of treatment an atheist couple might get in his courtroom.

  • asif hameed

    religious belief controll people’s mind.

  • Rob Andrews

    Let’s see if I got this straight: Jesus was both their lawyer and their judge and they lost anyway!
    Well what does that tell you about the verity of their beliefs.
    Awesome joke!

  • RussellW

    I wouldn’t hire Jesus as a lawyer, he couldn’t even save himself. I’d hire St Paul as my PR manager…definitely.
    “….the lion that they claimed was giving them direct counsel from God. A lion? Seems familiar.
    I wonder if the lion’s name was “Aslan”?

  • L.Long

    Where are all the ahole forced-birthers decrying these parents for endangering the baby!?!?!?! The forced-birthers are pro-life my ass!!!!!

  • Robster

    If were the parents I’d be concerned hiring the baby Jesus as a solicitor. Thing is, history has shown that in every case of anything the baby Jesus gets involved with fails, feed the starving? Failure. Heal the sick? Failure. Even protecting its own real estate in floods and storms, baby Jesus fails, it’s all he does well.Mum and dad would have been better off hiring a Batman toy and setting it to work, one advantage perhaps would be, the Batman toy exists.

  • 1859

    It was a Kenyan gay lion, that’s why they lost.
    Can you imagine the degree to which these lunatics would have indoctrinated their child, had they been allowed to keep her? I see psychological abuse just as horrendous as sexual or physical abuse – and maybe even worse. Worse because this is intentional, lifelong damage to a child’s mind. Although, sexual and physical abuse must do the same. Religion should be kept well away from children.

  • Stephen Harvie

    I suspect that the unfortunate child’s mother and father are also brother and sister…

  • Cali Ron

    Stupid fools hired a carpenter for a lawyer. No wonder they lost.

  • Cali Ron

    Tonye : Crazed evangelicals have been ‘talking in tongues’ for a long time. As a child I remember church elders during prayer time suddenly getting up and start saying gibberish, then another elder would stand up and give an ‘interpretation ‘. I myself was ‘taken by the Holy spirit ‘ and spoke in tongues when I was about 12 years old. I can still do it because it’s total rubbish,but to the deluded it’s god speaking through you.