Which Qu’ran, Mecca or Medina?

This is an excellent succinct synopsis of the issue of contradictions and abrogation in the Qu’ran. The Qu’ran can be broadly split into two based on when and where the revelations took place. This article is reblogged with kind permission from Beyond the Cusp – thanks! This is a quick synopsis for those of you who are unaware of things Qu’ranic:

The Quran as we know it today is in reality two quite different books. The older Quran was written in Mecca while the later Quran was written in Medina. This lead some scholars, both Muslim and non-Muslim, to refer to the Quran by its two parts, the Mecca Quran and the Medina Quran. Both were transcribed as told by Muhammad to a scribe, as Muhammad was illiterate as were a majority in his day. A majority of the Surah in the Quran were written in Mecca with the rest written in Medina. The problem is that the Surah in the Quran are not placed in chronological order, but are ordered as shown here, along with the city of origin of each Surah. This will have importance later in this article. By not ordering the Surah in their chronological order one must refer to the Hadiths and other Islamic texts to discern the original order as Muhammad received his visions from Allah. This added to the secretive mystery that was spun around the Quran making its reading less straightforward to non-Muslims.

The Mecca Quran was all about tolerance, tranquility, spirituality, acceptance, and inner cleansing through submission to the word of Allah. This earlier part of the Quran also dictated many of the rules that individual Muslims must perform and abide in their day-to-day lives. In my most humble opinion the Mecca Quran formed a basis for a religion that bridged some of the gaps and controversies between the Christians and the Jews. Where Christians no longer followed much of the Rules of Kashrut, the Jewish dietary laws, the Quran reinstated many of these laws. But in the Mecca Quran the idea of an eye for an eye was replaced by a more Christian philosophy. In many ways I see the Mecca Quran as an attempt at a compromise that would appeal to those Jews who found merit in the Christian teachings but refused to release from Jewish traditions while also appealing to those Christians who were not totally comfortable with having left so much of Judaism behind. Either way, Muhammad set about to preach his revelations and gain converts, mostly from among Christians and Jews. The major obstacle in Muhammad’s efforts was that times were economically very good and most people were quite content with their current way of life. When people are happy and things are going well, people are usually not open to change as change may upset the balance or whatever that gives them this comfort and wealth. With time, Muhammad became more vocal as he was probably very frustrated that so few were willing to accept his preaching of Allah. This lead to his being forcefully requested to depart Mecca. So, he and his core converts to Islam made their way to Medina.

Undaunted, upon his arrival in Medina Muhammad continued his preaching and search for converts. Initially Muhammad abided by the peaceable and tolerant words of the Mecca Quran. Early in the Medina period, the life for Muhammad and his followers was difficult as they faced a shortage of food as they had yet to become financially solvent within the society of Medina. This was resolved when Muhammad not only allowed for the raiding of the trade caravans, but blessed the actions and praised the raiders. This naturally upset many of the merchants who were dependant on these caravans for their livelihood. This combined with the rejection of the teaching proselytized by Muhammad by much of the Jewish tribes in Medina gave way to escalating violence. This conflict escalated finally leading to the attack by the forces of Muhammad upon the Banu-Nadhir Jews. During this period Muhammad started to reveal the parts of the Quran from Medina. He had originally ruled that Muslims prayed facing Jerusalem, but the opposition from the Jews had him replace Jerusalem as the center of faith to Mecca. His newer revelations were more violent and had the Jews as the primary focus of this violence. This Medina Quran also incorporated much of the moral blessings of violence and caravan raiding taken from the Arab tribes who thrived on these ventures. This lead to many of these tribes adopting this newer form of Islam as dictated by Muhammad thus supplying Muhammad with a sizeable army at his command.

These were the pressures and societal conditions that lead to the differences between the Mecca and Medina portions of the Quran. While in Mecca Muhammad enjoyed the shared wealth of his clan and his tribe. Living an easier life his writings were more inclusive and passive. After being forced from Mecca and taking up his new residence in Medina, Muhammad no longer had the clan and tribal support and was on his own. This harder reality affected his writings, which became more assertive and violent. The importance here is that Muhammad ruled that if a later Surah contradicted a previous Surah, then the most recent and newer Surah was the true word of Allah. This is why figuring out the chronological order of the Surah is so essential to understanding Islam. It is also why one must read the whole Quran and not listen and decide matters only on quotes of individual Surah. The fact that Surah exist that have opposite intent and meanings should be noted so one can discern the validity of each Surah. If one is quoting from the Mecca Quran and there is a contradicting Surah in the Medina Quran, then the quote is no longer valid. Where much of the rituals come from the Mecca Quran along with the calls for tolerance and peace, the more exclusionary and violence condoning Surah in the Medina Quran negate the peaceful intention of the Surah from the earlier Mecca writings. This is why one must be careful when accepting as fact anybody’s quoting of the Surah of the Quran.

Perhaps some day a scholar will write a version of the Quran with the Surah in chronological order with footnotes to denote which Surah have been superceded by later Surah. Until then we are left to research these discrepancies ourselves. Not an easy task, but a necessary one if we are to understand Islam and Muslims.

Beyond the Cusp

Stay in touch with A Tippling Philosopher on Facebook:
About Jonathan MS Pearce

Pearce is a philosopher, author, blogger, public speaker and teacher from Hampshire in the UK. He specialises in philosophy of religion, but likes to turn his hand to science, psychology, politics and anything involved in investigating reality. He is on a journey towards truth; come join him.

  • ArizonaAtheist

    I thought you might be interested in two books I have read and have found very useful. The first is Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text, by
    Neal Robinson, Georgetown University Press, 2003. The second is the only book in English as far as I’m aware about abrogation titled Abrogation in the Qur’an and Islamic Law: A Critical Study of the Concept of “Naskh” and its Impact, by Louay Fatoohi, Routledge, 2013. The first book has a lot of good information about the Qur’an, particularly the dating of the Suras and the scholarly research into it. Point is, the chronology is not as cut and dry as is often argued. The second book is a thorough look at the concept of abrogation and is very informative. I hope these help. BTW: I would imagine you can get these books via an interlibrary loan if you didn’t want to buy them outright. That is how I got my hands on them.

    Will your talk be available to watch on video? I am looking forward to hearing it.

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/ Jonathan MS Pearce

      It should be available on video at some point; will let you know. Thanks for those tips, abrogation came up quite a bit last night. It’s a tricky area with a lot of not necessarily English ink spilled about it.

  • http://www.atheismandthecity.com/ The Thinker

    In Wiki you can order the verses according to whether they are Meccan or Medinan and when they were revealed.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_surahs_in_the_Quran

    Some of the most violent verses and chapters are the last to be revealed, like chapter 9.

    • ArizonaAtheist

      I’ve recently finished reading many books about Islam and in actuality, there is a lot speculation about the proper ordering of the suras. Western scholars have only been able to speculatively date a few of them. This is because there is so few details about the (alleged) life of Muhammand that it’s difficult to reconstruct the order of the events, and put the suras in chronological order. The main source for the dating of the suras actually come from 8th century lists of Islamic scholars, and guess what – even these lists don’t agree with one another. For example, Adb al-Kaft’s list does have chapter 9 as the last one, but the other two lists do not. The one by al-Ya’qubt has 110, 56, 100, 113, and 114 as the last few chapters. Abu Salih-Ibn ‘ Abbas’ list has 56, 100, 113, and 114 as the last chapters. So, if we went by the majority vote 114 would be the last revealed. (Discovering the Qur’an, Robinson, Georgetown University Press, 2003; 69-70)

      • http://www.atheismandthecity.com/ The Thinker

        I agree. In the Wiki link above they have several different possible chronologies. Most of the chapters match up but not all of them. We generally know that chapters like 9, which is one of the most violent is a very late chapter. And chapter 109, which says that Muslims should basically coexist with non-believers is a relatively early Meccan chapter.

  • Zarayah Israel

    I learned about the two streams of Islam being based on two separate stages of Muhammad’s life from Ibn Warraq. It definitely helped me to understand why there are peaceful Muslims, and Muslims like Boko Haram and Daesh, all claiming to follow the “Prophet”.

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/ Jonathan MS Pearce

      I would like, if I didn’t have a reading list as long as my arm, to read Ibn Warraq. I have read about him, listened to him and read synopses of his books, but never read a book of his yet.