The Probability of Nothing; the Necessity of Something

Here is another comment on the probability of nothingness, something that has piqued my interest over the last week or so. It comes from Ryan Covington on the facebook page for this blog (drop a Like if you have time!).

Here’s a thought along the same lines: what is the probability of nothingness, given that 100% of our observations are of something existing and never of “nothing” existing? If we have no examples of nothingness, are we entitled to assume it is possible?

This goes back to the a priori notion of probability. It does make you wonder though: if we assume the probability of something existing (i.e. some kind of Cartesian minimal existence) as being 100%, then this means that the probability of nothing existing is necessarily 0%. If something does exist, then nothing can’t exist (in a manner of speaking – you get my drift).

This does seem inductive / a posteriori, rather than a priori, but what is the worth of a “potential” a priori probability as I mentioned the other day? And from this we can ask the question as to whether nothingness is even possible?

This necessary property of existence (arguably matter, or the universe, or some fundamental physics) is what I took away from reading Laurence Krauss’ A Universe from Nothing some years back.

Indeed, as I mentioned in my book Did God Create the Universe from Nothing?, could it not be that the universe is necessary in the same way that theists often posit that God is necessary? In fact, it is a more parsimonious explanation, since we have merely the universe as necessary, rather than the universe + a necessary god.

Either way, I think it is necessary that you get my book…:DidGodCreatetheUniverse

"In the gospel case, part of 'being taken seriously' was convincing Jews that Jesus fulfilled ..."

Christmas Crackers: Why Return to an ..."
"God wanted everyone to die off (as punishment for something) so that only a subsequent ..."

The story of the Exodus from ..."
"This is silly. We would detect that as false because we know how modern US ..."

Christmas Crackers: Why Return to an ..."
"“And it means that the natural law you "believe" in is that of bronze age ..."

Christmas Crackers: Why Return to an ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment