Cranston Commenters #1

Cranston Commenters #1 January 12, 2012

The posts on this site, including all the Cranston Commenters posts, reflect the opinions of JT Eberhard, not the Secular Student Alliance.

The commenters in the Providence Journal article on the Cranston banner are a bunch of animals.  I’ve decided to dissect a bunch of them over the course of the next few days.  I just spent my lunch hour going through a bunch of them.  Enjoy.

Wake up RI says:

“Cranston – please appeal.

To the Court:

Uh…. so should we file a “Prayer for Relief” or not? We don’t want to harm the ACLU’s delicate sensibilities any further with historical jargon that has become meaningless except as polite introductory verbiage. Like in the banner.

The defendants should appeal.”

If the jargon is meaningless, why does it matter if it stays up?  Why should they waste money and time appealing if it’s meaningless?

Unless, of course, you don’t really think it’s meaningless.  This would make you a liar.

"Just one more reason to sh*t on yahwe. Lol lust is great. It can get ..."

Three reasons you shouldn’t masturbate, courtesy ..."
"Didn't we all lol I was born in '88 actually"

Three reasons you shouldn’t masturbate, courtesy ..."
"In fact I have thoughts about numerous women, also masturbating, and playing with each other's ..."

Three reasons you shouldn’t masturbate, courtesy ..."
"Brad isn't brainwashed.. brad is getting paid"

Scam artist preacher David E. Taylor ..."

Browse Our Archives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment