I discovered this message board, THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY, which at first glance appears to be a badly-designed little corner of neoconservatism. Appearances deceive, however, as the board boasts over 250,ooo posts.
Here, have some of their more telling forum names:
DEFEATING MARXISM/SOCIALISM—WHILE REBUILDING CONSERVATISM
BORDER SECURITY and ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
ISLAMIC CULT’S RELIGIOUS WAR AGAINST CIVILIZED WORLD
FINANCIAL, ENERGY & OIL TOPICS
AYN RAND/JOHN GALT & Ayn Rand’s Ideas: An Introduction
I found quite a few rather interesting posts about the “homosexual agenda“.
1. Obama directs State Department and US agencies to force foreign countries to support international homosexual agendaual agenda!
The Obama administration has announced that it is taking the unbelievable role of pushing the homosexual agenda around the world and punishing countries that don’t comply.
Back in July, MassResistance reported how the Pakistanis angrily denounced the US Embassy’s open homosexual parties as “cultural terrorism.” Well, that was just the beginning.The White House website announces Obama’s new worldwide LGBT directive.
Now, foreign countries which seek to protect their citizens against homosexuality and the homosexual movement will be actively confronted by America’s State Department, foreign service, and other federal departments, according to a Presidential Memorandum released by the Obama Administration announced on Dec. 6.
Mirroring the homosexual lobby’s (and the Left’s) traditional tactics, Obama is characterizing this as a “civil rights” quest for homosexuality and transgenderism.
Take another look the list of federal agencies involved, and the vehemence of the Obama administration on this. Make no mistake about it. This will lead to increasingly brutal oppression against people with traditional values both in America and around the world.
Not wanting to be killed for being queer is “an agenda”?
The author actually frames a policy of not wanting countries to kill gays for being gay as “brutal oppression against people with traditional values”. My brain hurts now.
Anyway, I thought you guys might like to check out this message board, maybe head over there and offer a differing perspective?