Along the merry debunking train we go.
The hell? He accuses William of believing in solid fact and yet chastises him for speaking out of ignorance?
Also, if you have to disdain facts in order to maintain your beliefs, you’re not demonstrating much esteem for your beliefs. If the person making this post had facts, you bet your ass they’d be trotting them out. After all, he tries to paint god’s existence as a fact (right after taking an epic two-flush monster shit on the reliability of facts).
And who says the world was created out of a pile of dirt? Where was this pile of dirt if not on the world?
And of course, no arguments for the credibility of god’s existence. Why should there be? Good arguments are built on facts.
This is what religion can do to a human brain.