Let’s face it. Find someone in the United States who is opposed to gay rights and who among us (Christians included) if forced to bet our life savings on guessing their religion wouldn’t say “Christian?” Sure, no all Christians oppose gay rights. But of those who oppose gay rights they are almost universally religious. And in the United States that means they’re very likely a Christian. There may be atheist anti gay-rights people out there, but they’re about as detectable as snipes.
While it’s clear that gay rights are opposed because it flies in the face of people’s personal religious beliefs, that reason won’t fly in court or in Congress. And so rather than telling the truth we get a wide assortment of silly justifications, like that somehow letting gay people marry will make straight people dissolve their marriage to the person they love because…penises? Who knows? But there’s certainly no doubt that many people who think their religion produces more moral behavior can’t seem to even start the conversation about gay marriage without lying.
Anyway, when trying to establish that homosexuality is somehow harmful to society you can’t talk long without hearing that gay people aren’t allowed to donate blood. If people having same-sex intercourse are not tainted in some pathological way, why would this be?
It turns out there’s an explanation: panic over the AIDS epidemic that was spread largely by, you guessed it, the opponents of same-sex marriage. However, the most prestigious body of medical minds in the world, the American Medical Association, is now recommending that the FDA drop the prohibition against gay people donating blood. There’s no reason for it, and it turns out a person is never too gay to save the life of another human (probably a Christian or one of their loved ones):
The nation’s largest association of physicians voted this week to oppose a long-standing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ban on gay men donating blood, a rule created as part of the panic that accompanied the early years of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
The American Medical Association’s (AMA) vote, which took place late on Tuesday, was a strong medical rebuke to the 1983 policy. Virtually no (1 in 2 million) HIV infections are caused by transfusions, partly because modern medicine allows for individualized HIV/AIDS testing. Because HIV positive individuals can be specifically screened out, prohibiting any man who has had sex with a man (MSM) since 1977, as the FDA rule does, is unequivocally blanket discrimination against gay and bisexual men as a class.
The AMA’S decision is a response to these scientific and social realities. “The lifetime ban on blood donation for men who have sex with men is discriminatory and not based on sound science,” AMA board member Dr. William Kobler said. “This new policy urges a federal policy change to ensure blood donation bans or deferrals are applied to donors according to their individual level of risk and are not based on sexual orientation alone.”
So now that this sincere and very real reason for opposing gay rights is out of the way, I’m sure anti-gay people will come rushing to the side of equality. Why wouldn’t they? I mean, this was their real concern and not just a cover for the insistence that people organize their love lives around other people’s religion, right?
My brother is a recently out bisexual. He’s a universal donor and has wanted to give blood but can’t. The Red Cross already can’t get enough blood donations. Thanks haters.