A woman in Sudan, Amira Osman Hamed, is about to go on trial for the crime of not wearing a hijab. Should she be convicted she will likely be flogged, literally beaten, for not putting a piece of cloth on her head at the arbitrarily appointed times – as if the crime of beating someone is less severe than not wearing a fucking head scarf.
This isn’t the first time Hamed’s dress has provoked the ire of Sudanese authorities. In 2002, she was arrested for wearing trousers. Thanks to the help of a lawyer, she was charged only with a fine in that case.
Both of Hamed’s supposed crimes have been in violation of Article 152 of the Sudanese Penal Code of 1991, which states, “Whoever does in a public place an indecent act or an act contrary to public morals or wears an obscene outfit or contrary to public morals or causing an annoyance to public feelings shall be punished with flogging which may not exceed 40 lashes or with fine or with both.”
“They want us to be like Taliban women,” Hamed said in an interview with the AFP, describing the restrictive nature of the law.
She’s not the only one to deem the law vastly unfair. According to Tawanda Hondora, deputy director of Amnesty International’s Africa program, “Women are routinely arrested, detained, tried and then, on conviction, flogged simply because a police officer disapproves of their clothing” under the enforcement of Article 152.
Most women would lose their soul living in such a place, but not Amira. She says she’d rather be flogged than submit to their defamatory rules:
After being detained by police for refusing to wear a hijab on Aug. 27, she says she is willing to face the flogging in order to protest the law that requires her to cover her hair.
That woman is a god damn badass.