Oral arguments from yesterday’s hearing in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court have been posted on the the Suffolk University Law School website.
The Appignani Humanist Legal Center is representing anonymous parents and students in Massachusetts public schools in an attempt to stop the pledge from being recited daily.
I have not read the briefs in this case. It’s apparently being tried based on the Massachusetts Equal Rights Amendment, a provision not every state has. This case is important, although it is unlikely to have national implications since the law the Plaintiffs are suing under is neither a federal law nor a uniform law adopted by all the states.
I don’t know who the Justice is who asked the questions of the school district’s attorney beginning at 18:59, but I love her. “It’s hard for a six-year-old to opt out [of saying the pledge],” she pointed out.
Then, when the attorney said that the historical context of the founding of the nation had to be considered, she asked, “Suppose it said instead, ‘one nation led by white men’? … Historically that would have been accurate.” The counsel for the school districts admitted that would be problematic. If the Court strikes the pledge, this may be the telling moment.
Another Justice asked the school district’s attorney, “How would a six-year-old or an eight-year old know they could opt out [of saying the pledge] if they had not read [relevant case law]”? Excellent question, your honor, especially since, if they were told so only at the first day of class, they would be unlikely to remember that.
If the pledge is meaningless, why do we bother having children say it?
Look for an opinion in upcoming months.
Got a legal question? Email me at email@example.com. I’m a lawyer, but there’s only a 2% chance I’m licensed in your state. Whether I answer your question or not, sending me an email or reading this blog post does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. I’m on Twitter as @aramink, and you can see my regular blog at www.aramink.com.