Study finds religious people more likely to lie for financial gain.

In a study that wasn’t just a cursory glance at megapastors or the Catholic Church, researchers have found that those who claim religion is very important in their lives are more likely to lie for financial gain.

What’s new in this study by University of Regina economist Jason Childs is its breakdown of the personality traits of the liars. Unlike some previous research, he did not find men are more likely to lie than women.

However, he discovered other factors predicted a greater likelihood of telling an untruth—including the assertion that religion plays an important role in your life.

Somewhere (or not), Christopher Hitchens is chuckling.

Childs’ experiment featured 400 students drawn from introductory economics classes at the University of Regina in Saskatchewan. After providing basic biographical information, they were paired off and assigned to play the role of either “sender” or “receiver.”

Senders were informed that the pair would receive a total of two payments: $5 and $15 in some cases, $5 and $7 in others. They would receive one of the amounts, while the receiver collected the other.

They were then told to send a message to the receiver, who sat in a nearby room, informing him or her of which payoff was greater. The receiver would presumably then choose to take the more lucrative one, leaving the sender stuck with the lower amount.

Unless, of course, he or she chose to fib.

So who lied for personal financial gain? “We find that sex, age, grade point average, student debt, size of return, socioeconomic status, and average time spent in religious observation are not related to the decision to lie,” Childs writes in the journalEconomics Letters.

Among those more likely to lie for financial gain were:

• Business majors. “It could be that these students are more prone to lying by nature or training,” Childs writes. “It could also be that individuals strongly motivated by financial returns, and therefore more likely to lie for a monetary payoff, are more likely to pursue an education in business.” (Previous research has found higher levels of academic cheating among business majors.)

• Students whose parents were divorced. This is in line with expectations, in that past research has found children of divorce are more likely to engage in anti-social behavior. Perhaps the belief they’ve been cheated out of a happy childhood may lead them to feel cheating is OK.

• Those for whom religion was more important to their lives. “This is surprising,” Childs writes, as most religions “promote honesty as a virtue. It may be that students for whom religion was important feel separate from other students at this largely secular university,” and thus feel less compelled to be honest with them.

Or it could be that forgiveness, to them, is automatically given rather than earned through contrition and moral behavior.  Whatever the motivation, this is another piece of evidence that flies in the face of the claim that religion makes people more moral.  In fact, in situations like these, faith is correlated with less moral behavior.

"I highly doubt anybody fears you but if it makes you feel smart or superior, ..."

Frank Turek fears me. Also he ..."
"I agree you have the right to freedom to believe or not but what really ..."

Frank Turek fears me. Also he ..."
"In reality, most married Christian women I've known seem pretty happy, and neither them nor ..."

Are you a Christian man? Don’t ..."
"That video makes me laugh every time I watch it. Watched it with my 16 ..."

Church membership plummets in Denmark after ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • unbound55

    Matches my own experiences as well.

    For example, when my neighbors started putting up fences, I contributed to the cost of the fence on my property since I was intended on putting up a fence myself. Similarly another neighbor contributed to cost of the fence touching his property (I was the 2nd person in our cluster to build the fence). But the really good christians on the last part of the fence not only didn’t bother to contribute to others, they were actually overheard stating that they were waiting for everyone to complete their fences so they could just fill in the gaps.

    So, the atheist of the neighborhood started the trend of sharing costs appropriately, the regular christians then contributed, but the really good Catholics (lots of kids, don’t believe in birth control, church regularly, kids sent to Catholic school) just looked to use their neighbors for their own gain.

  • Zinc Avenger

    Study confirms the “never take just one Baptist fishing” joke?

  • Loqi

    I’ve found that “religion” and “lying for financial gain” are quite often synonymous.

    Off topic: business majors cheating in college? What the hell for? At least at my school, cheating in business classes would’ve been like cheating on a survey.

  • baal

    I think this study is describing an instance of a real problem with religion and how humans think in two ways. First, the various US christian sect like to push sectarian identity – else the flock has a bad habit of shopping around and that messes up donations. I’d like to see if the study could have included a “strong tribal identity” control. Second, when your worldview is based on accepting assertions of authority rather than thought or facts and tends to skip personal morality (use God’s and ‘sin’ instead!). Unless their sect teaches unfairness inre money is a sin, that though will simply not e on their radar.

  • Stev84

    Not surprising at all. The entire modus operandi of religion is lying for financial gain.

  • Angus

    There are two measures of religiosity in this study: 1. A self rated scale on how important religion is in one’s life and 2. The amount of time one spends in regious observances (i.e. going to church). Only the self rated scale correlated with lying. Given this discrepancy, one cannot unambiguously conclude that religion relates to lying.