2016-11-09T23:34:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Nov 9, 2016 / 04:34 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Catholics voted once again for the winning presidential candidate in Tuesday’s election, as they have done in recent elections. “Catholics continue to be the only major religious voting block that can shift from one election to the next,” Dr. Mark Gray of the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) at Georgetown University stated on Wednesday. “This is what makes the Catholic vote such an important swing vote. Presidential candidates who win the Catholic vote almost always win the presidency,” he added. The few election polls that did list respondents by religion showed results for Catholics that varied widely depending on the day. Polling experts who warned of “volatility in the polls” insisted that the Catholic vote would be almost impossible to predict before the election. For instance, one Investor’s Business Daily tracking poll showed Trump winning Catholics by 16 points on Nov. 4, only to have Clinton winning Catholic voters by three points on Nov. 7. After President Obama narrowly carried the Catholic vote by two points in his 2012 re-election bid, Trump won the Catholic vote by seven points on Tuesday, according to exit polls. The Pew Research Center reported on the religious voter data. This marks the fourth straight election that Catholics have voted for the winning president. In 2000, Catholics also voted for the winner of the popular vote Al Gore, who narrowly lost the Electoral College. Trump lost the popular vote, thus breaking the trend of Catholics voting with the popular vote in presidential elections. Trump’s margin of victory among White Catholics on Tuesday was striking. While that bloc normally votes Republican – Mitt Romney won it by 19 points in 2012 – Trump went even further and won it by 23 points according to  exit polls, the highest margin of victory in that bloc since before the 2000 election. As expected, Trump lost the Hispanic Catholic vote decidedly – 67 to 26 percent – but still at the lowest margin of defeat for a Republican presidential ticket for that bloc since the 2004 election. And, the group CatholicVote.org noted in its post-election statement, “among non-Spanish speaking Latino Catholics the margin was likely significantly closer.” Dr. Gray cautioned that, although Catholics clearly supported Trump in the exit polls, more data may be needed for the full context. “What we don't know yet is why Catholics voted as a majority for Donald Trump,” he told CNA. Historically, Catholics vary in their ultimate party preference – usually voting for the winning party in an election. “No other major religious group does this,” Dr. Gray emphasized. “Other Christians reliably vote majority Republican. Those of non-Christian affiliations or no religious affiliation vote consistently Democrat.” There was a divide in support among weekly churchgoing Christians and those who do not attend church as frequently. Exit polls showed Trump winning among weekly churchgoers 56 to 40 percent, while among those attending a “few times a year” there was basically an even split. Clinton enjoyed a large victory (31 points) among those who do not attend religious services.   Read more

2016-11-09T21:53:00+00:00

Denver, Colo., Nov 9, 2016 / 02:53 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In a lopsided Election Day vote, Colorado voters decided to legalize assisted suicide. Foes of the ballot measure warned that it will have grave consequences for the vulnerable. “The mission we have as citizens of Colorado should be to help people live with dignity – not to offer them more options to kill themselves,” the Colorado Catholic Conference said Nov. 9. Colorado voters approved assisted suicide by a vote of 65 percent to 35 percent. The conference said the passage of the assisted suicide measure was “a great travesty of compassion and choice for the sick, the poor, the elderly and our most vulnerable residents.” The ballot measure, modeled on a 22-year-old Oregon law, is called the Colorado End-of-Life Options Act. It uses the language of “medical aid in dying.” It will allow an adult with a terminal illness to request a lethal prescription from their physician. The person must be deemed mentally competent and two physicians must diagnosis the person as having six months or fewer to live. The measure requires self-administration of the drug, called secobarbital, which is also used for lethal injections in some states. The ballot measure requires the official cause of death to be listed as a patient’s underlying condition, not as an assisted suicide. Barbara Coombs, president of legal assisted suicide advocacy group Compassion and Choices, said the vote was “an especially tremendous victory for terminally ill adults who worry about horrific suffering in their final days,” the Associated Press reports. The state's Catholic conference rejected depictions of assisted suicide as a private choice: “killing, no matter what its motives, is never a private matter; it always impacts other people and has much wider implications.” The measure will deepen divisions of race, ethnicity, and income, the conference charged. “As Pope Francis has noted it only furthers a ‘throwaway’ culture,” it said. “Proposition 106 has legalized the ability of a doctor to write prescriptions for the sole purpose of killing another human being and the ability of insurance companies to refuse treatment of patients they consider terminal.” Divine Mercy Supportive Care, a Colorado-based nonprofit hospice and palliative health care provider, declared itself a “no-kill provider” in the wake of the vote. The Catholic organization’s policies follow the U.S. bishops’ ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care. The organization presented itself as “the antidote to assisted suicide.” It said advances in pain and symptom management have helped alleviate the suffering of advanced illness. At the same time, it said several other Colorado hospice agencies have said they are willing to accommodate assisted suicide. Proponents of legal assisted suicide failed to pass bills in the Colorado legislature in 2015 and 2016, before placing the proposal on the ballot. The ballot measure’s supporters raised $4.8 million from groups like the Compassion & Choices Action Network, the Denver Post reports. It presented the story of Brittany Maynard, who killed herself in Oregon in 2014 while suffering an aggressive brain tumor. Catholic, Mormon, and Evangelical leaders played a role in the opposition to the ballot measure. Opponents raised $2.3 million, including contributions from the Dioceses of Denver, St. Louis, and Arlington. Five other states have similar laws or court action permitting assisted suicide: Oregon, Washington, California, Montana, and Vermont. Read more

2016-11-09T18:52:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Nov 9, 2016 / 11:52 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The death penalty was up for a vote in California, Nebraska and Oklahoma on Tuesday, but stands against capital punishment proved unpopular with voters in all three states. In California, Propo... Read more

2016-11-09T17:22:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Nov 9, 2016 / 10:22 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Bishops in the United States called on Catholics to pray for elected officials on the morning following the 2016 presidential election, and exhorted them to work for unity and to promote the com... Read more

2016-11-09T13:30:00+00:00

Vatican City, Nov 9, 2016 / 06:30 am (CNA/EWTN News).- On Wednesday Pope Francis said that in order to be more like Jesus, we must not be indifferent to others, but rather meet people where they are and show mercy to those in need, especially the sick ... Read more

2016-11-09T13:02:00+00:00

Canberra, Australia, Nov 9, 2016 / 06:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Australian government's proposed permanent ban on visas for refugees and asylum seekers who have recently arrived by boat drew strong criticism from a bishop who is a former refugee himself.  “Seeking asylum even by boat is not illegal. It is a basic human right. Yet not content with demeaning them, the Australian government now wants to introduce laws that will ban them from ever coming here,” Bishop Vincent Long of Parramatta said. The bishop is the Australian Catholic Bishops’ Delegate for Migrants and Refugees. He fled Vietnam by boat at a young age. He spoke against the ban in a Nov. 7 statement on the media blog of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference. For Bishop Long, the motives for the measures are “questionable at best and sinister at worst.” He cited the situations on Manus Island, located in northern Papua New Guinea, and the island Micronesian country of Nauru, where about 1,800 people have been indefinitely detained. Australian authorities typically remove refugees who arrive at the mainland to these islands, in the name of offshore processing. “Domestic advocates and international agencies have been appalled by the conditions under which asylum seekers live and the effects on their health, spirits and self-respect,” the bishop said. “To single out and punish further a small number of people who came by boat, even if they are found to meet the refugee definition is deliberately cruel and un-Australian. It betrays the tradition, status and character of the country that we are proud of – a richly resourced country with a big heart for migrants and refugees.” The ban would be in effect for a lifetime, even if a refugee were to establish himself in another country and try to revisit Australia decades later. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull spoke about the proposal Oct. 31 “the door to Australia is closed to those who seek to come here by boat with a people smuggler.” “That absolutely unflinching, unequivocal message has to be loud and clear,” he told media. Foreign Minister Julie Bishop cited the need to discourage dangerous boat trips. “I will never forget 1,200 people that we know of drowned at sea coming to Australia under these people smuggling networks,” she said, according to news.com.au. “We cannot have situations where people are drowning at sea.” Critics of the ban say it may violate the international refugee convention. Bishop Long urged Australians to reject the “cruel and unnecessary measures” of banning the refugees from applying for visas. He asked political leaders to “resist this latest mean-spirited move against asylum seekers and to reclaim the reputation of a decent, humane and generous country.” “It is the kind of country that refugees like myself are indebted to and proud to call home,” he said. “We must find a more just, humane and effective way in dealing with the complex issues of seeking asylum and refugee protection.” On Manus Island, asylum seekers appear to suffer medical neglect, wasting and severe ill health, the Australian Medical Association has told a Senate inquiry. While the association said the medical accounts it received could not be independently verified, it accused Australia’s Department of Immigration and Border Protection authorities of failing to respond to its inquiries in a timely and comprehensive way, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. Health workers had until recently been under legal sanctions that barred them from speaking about conditions on Manus Island. The medical association’s president Dr. Michael Gannon said there was an “inappropriate degree of secrecy” about the department’s attitude to asylum seeker patients, as well as “hyperbole from refugee advocates.” “It’s actually very hard to get accurate clinical information,” Dr. Gannon said. There are presently negotiations underway to resettle the refugees, possibly in Canada and the United States. Read more

2016-11-09T11:45:00+00:00

Vatican City, Nov 9, 2016 / 04:45 am (CNA/EWTN News).- After Donald Trump pulled off what was for many a surprising victory in the United States election, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin offered his prayers that the new president-elect would promote peace in a world torn by conflict. “First of all, we take note with respect the will of the American people in this exercise of democracy which they tell me was characterized by a large turnout. Then we congratulate the new president, so that his government can be truly fruitful,” Cardinal Parolin told Vatican Radio Nov. 19. He also assured of his prayers, “so that the Lord illuminate him and sustain him in the service of his homeland, naturally, but also of the peace and wellbeing of the world.” “I believe that today it is needed for everyone to work to change the global situation, which is a situation of serious laceration and grave conflict.” Cardinal Parolin spoke at the inauguration of academic year of the Pontifical Lateran University in Rome. His comments came in wake of the election of Republican Donald Trump as the next president of the United States of America, concluding what has been seen as a particularly grueling election cycle. To the shock and surprise of many, Trump, who walked into Election Day as the perceived underdog, came out on top with 289 electoral votes, well over the required 270 needed to win, while Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton lagged behind with just 218 electoral votes, according to CNN. Although the Catholic vote was in large part divided due to prolife and immigration issues, one of the key topics that likely loomed large in the minds of Catholics as Trump’s victory was announced was his promise to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, and as well as Pope Francis’ response. During his Feb. 19 inflight news conference en route from Juarez to Rome, Pope Francis responded to criticism of Trump, who had called the Pope “political” and threatened to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border. “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian. This is not in the Gospel,” the Pope said. In a Feb. 19 statement the following day, the former Vatican spokesman, Fr. Federico Lombardi SJ, said assured that Francis’ comment “was never intended to be, in any way, a personal attack or an indication of how to vote.” The Pope has repeatedly talked about the need to build bridges rather than walls throughout his pontificate, and his remarks should be understood in this sense, he said at the time. “It is not a specific issue, limited to this case. It is his general attitude, very consistent with a courageous following of the Gospel's teachings of welcoming and solidarity.” When asked what the Vatican’s response to this situation was in light of Trump’s election, Cardinal Parolin said we must wait to “see how the president moves.” “Normally they say: it’s one thing to be a candidate, it’s another thing to be president, to have a responsibility,” he said, explaining that for him, “even from what I've heard, although I have not looked into it much, the future president has already expressed himself as a leader.” However, when it comes to specific issues and how Trump will act on them, “we will see what choices he makes and according to that you can also make a judgment,” he said, adding that “it seems premature to make judgments.” After the final election results came in and Trump had officially received a call from Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton conceding defeat, he gave a 17 minute speech in which he thanked Clinton for “a very hard fought campaign,” and offered thanks to those who supported him along the way. He said the time has come for America “to bind the wounds of division, we have to get together...I say it is time for us to come together as one united people.” Trump pledged that he would be a president “for all Americans,” and that by working together, “we will begin the urgent task of rebuilding our country and renewing the American dream.” Having spent his entire life in business and looking at the “untapped potential in projects and people” throughout the world, the president-elect said he wants every single American to have “the possibility to realize his or her fullest potential,” adding that the forgotten will be “forgotten no longer.” Speaking of a stronger economy and better highways, infrastructure and care of veterans, Trump also offered a word on foreign policy, stating that “we will get along with all other nations willing to get along with us.” “I want to tell the world community that while we will always put America’s interests first, we will deal fairly with everyone: all people and all other nations. We will seek common ground, not hostility, partnership, not conflict,” he said. Although the election cycle “was tough,” Trump promised his best, adding “I look forward very much to being your president...I can only say that while the campaign is over, our work on this movement is really just beginning.” However, with many Catholics perplexed and unsure as to what a Trump presidency will hold, some Catholic leaders have already spoken out on the need to remain unified and steadfast in maintaining and promoting Catholic values. In a speech at the Catholic Distance University Founder’s Award Dinner, where he was the recipient of the Founder’s Award, Supreme Knight of Columbus said Nov. 5 that said that no matter the election result, Catholics must be a sign of unity, rather than division. “The question we should ask ourselves is in what way Catholics in America can be a future source of unity and reconciliation or whether we will be a cause of further division and hostility,” he said, noting that the answer to the question “will depend in large measure upon what it means today to be a Catholic in America. “In other words, what is fundamental to our identity as Catholics?” In a series of tweets before the final election results came in, Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles offered his own insight as to what the answer of that question is, and where Catholics should be keeping their focus as things move forward. “We are not Republicans or Democrats or liberals or conservatives. Before everything else, we are followers of Christ,” he said in a Nov. 8 tweet, adding in a second that “we are children of God, made in his image, called to be saints & to work for his Kingdom, which is the family of God on earth.” In his comments at the Founder’s Award Dinner, Anderson stressed that no matter what the outcome of the election was, division would still run deep in the U.S., including within the Catholic community. The solution to this, he said, will require “faithful Catholics to fully exercise their responsibilities as citizens” at a time when many are disheartened and frustrated. “Now is the time for more – not less – Catholic values in our electoral process. Now is the time for more – not less – Catholic values in our nation.” Read more

2016-11-09T02:35:00+00:00

Washington D.C., Nov 8, 2016 / 07:35 pm (CNA).- A new action agenda from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has drawn praise from the U.S. bishops as a step towards the “integral ecology” taught in Pope Francis’ encyclical on creation. “The concern for the good of people, especially the poor and vulnerable communities, is one of the central messages in Pope Francis' encyclical on the environment,” said Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami, chair of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development. “We welcome efforts by the EPA that recognize what the Pope calls 'integral ecology,' where respect for human life and wellbeing go hand in hand with environmental protection,” he said Nov. 4. The EPA’s Environmental Justice 2020 Action Agenda builds on its 2014 effort to integrate “environmental justice considerations” into all its agency programs. It aims to strengthen the agency’s collaboration with partners and “demonstrate progress on significant national challenges facing minority and low-income communities.” The agenda aims to improve environmental results for overburdened communities. In 2015, Pope Francis published his encyclical “Laudato Si” on the care for creation. He covered a wide range of topics in relation to the environment – from climate change, species extinction, and resource depletion to waste, economic structures and global inequality. The encyclical praised St. Francis of Assisi for living out an “integral ecology” with joy and authenticity. “He was particularly concerned for God’s creation and for the poor and outcast… He shows us just how inseparable the bond is between concern for nature, justice for the poor, commitment to society, and interior peace,” the Pope wrote. Saying that the earth “is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth,” the Pope stated, “Never have we so hurt and mistreated our common home as we have in the last two hundred years.”   He also spoke of developed nations’ obligations involving renewable resources and the development of poorer countries. The same encyclical criticized abortion, population control and gender ideology. Read more

2016-11-08T23:23:00+00:00

Arlington, Va., Nov 8, 2016 / 04:23 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Despite ongoing religious freedom threats, humility and cheerfulness in serving the poor are at the heart of the mission for the Little Sisters of the Poor, the order’s vocations director s... Read more

2016-11-08T18:56:00+00:00

Vancouver, Canada, Nov 8, 2016 / 11:56 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In a unanimous ruling, the highest court in British Columbia said that a Christian law school could not be denied accreditation merely for holding biblical beliefs on sexual morality. “A society that does not admit of and accommodate differences cannot be a free and democratic society – one in which its citizens are free to think, to disagree, to debate and to challenge the accepted view without fear of reprisal,” the high court said. “This case demonstrates that a well-intentioned majority acting in the name of tolerance and liberalism, can, if unchecked, impose its views on the minority in a manner that is in itself intolerant and illiberal.” In a unanimous Nov. 1 decision, the British Columbia Court of Appeal agreed with a lower court that the Law Society of British Columbia had wrongly denied accreditation to Trinity Western University’s proposed law school. The law society had initially voted to accept the school's graduates, but then reversed its decision in late 2014, because the university holds beliefs about sexual ethics based on the Bible. Religious freedom advocates applauded the decision. “All Canadians benefit from this decision,” said Gerald Chipeur, a member of a Canadian law firm involved in the case. “It affirms the principle that everyone should be free to live and work according to their sincerely held beliefs and convictions.” “Faith-based educational institutions should always be welcome in a diverse society and be free to operate according to the faith they teach and espouse,” he said. “No one can be banned from their profession because they hold biblically based views, and no Christian institution of higher education can be sanctioned because it reflects essential tenets of the Christian religion,” added Benjamin Bull, chief counsel with the religious freedom group ADF International.   Read more



TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built an ark to survive the great flood?

Select your answer to see how you score.


Browse Our Archives